Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gearing us up for the “new” mule deer plan which most likely was copy and pasted from the old one. I guess we will see.Fwp must be feeling the squeeze as they put out another press release about myths and truths about mule deer

Me also… my answers were as follows:
Abysmal, didn’t hunt elk, and decent(my last and final answer)
At least the last survey could be interpreted. What are they supposed to do with "abysmal" and "decent"?Based on FWP’s interpretation of their last hunter satisfaction survey I would expect a summary of your survey answers to show that @ Eric Albus experienced satisfaction with at least two out of three categories used to determine hunter’s satisfaction with their experience….
The last one was multiple choice - not a lot of "intrepretation" there, unless im missing something.Based on FWP’s interpretation of their last hunter satisfaction survey I would expect a summary of your survey answers to show that @ Eric Albus experienced satisfaction with at least two out of three categories used to determine hunter’s satisfaction with their experience….
I think there was a lawsuit against FWP for saying 3 was positive.The last one was multiple choice - not a lot of "intrepretation" there, unless im missing something.
The last one was multiple choice - not a lot of "intrepretation" there, unless im missing something.
It wasn't 3/5, it was essentially "neither" when compared to the other options which were 2 degrees of unsatisfactory and 2 degrees of satisfactory. Like a null vote that they interpreted into the positive (satisfactory) category.I’d call describing a 3/5 as satisfactory,“interpretation”.
It wasn't 3/5, it was essentially "neither" when compared to the other options which were 2 degrees of unsatisfactory and 2 degrees of satisfactory. Like a null vote that they interpreted into the positive (satisfactory) category.