SFC B
Well-known member
YOU may say that........at least 99% of archery hunters would hemorrhage from every orifice if it was a possibility.I could make that work...![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YOU may say that........at least 99% of archery hunters would hemorrhage from every orifice if it was a possibility.I could make that work...![]()
And there are ways to provide oppurtunity for guys who want to fill a tag with any deer while keeping age class and buck to doe ratios in check, for guys who want antlers. Nobody ever wants to give an inch on what they want or how they think it should be. Thats the problem.Some of you guys are naive on the complexities of managing a deer herd. Biologists (hopefully) have a herd size they are comfortable with that will give everyone a chance to be happy. People want different things for different reasons. Some people want to kill a doe, some people trophies, some people only want to archery hunt, and some people don’t want deer (insurance companies and farm bureau) at all.
Also I cant think of a worse idea. But im sure someone would love it as long as they don't lose there rut hunting. Dont get me wrong do I bowhunt during the rut? Absolutely. Would I be upset if we couldn't hunt it? Not necessarily.Why not make just one 2 week season in early November for EVERY weapon?
I typed that wrong....meant it to say October....no rut hunts for anyone......wouldn't be that big a deal to me, but again the uproar would be bow hunters.Also I cant think of a worse idea. But im sure someone would love it as long as they don't lose there rut hunting. Dont get me wrong do I bowhunt during the rut? Absolutely. Would I be upset if we couldn't hunt it? Not necessarily.
So you're saying there's still a chance?We tried last year. Same senator tried to build an NFL stadium to move the Chicago Bears.
The guy lost all credibility after that stunt with the Chicago bears.So you're saying there's still a chance?![]()
I would agree with the safety aspect being educational and about the shot distance not changing. We have been able to use straight wall rifle cartridges for several years now (not apples to apples but you get the jist of the argument) and I would say our group is 50:50 on rifles vs shotguns. The average shot distance is probably still 50-75 yards. The terrain of southeast Minnesota is very similar to where I hunt only 20 miles south of the border. It is going to limit the shot distance and while the shot distance may increase slightly with rifles it’s going to take a very specific set up to enable any sort of long distance shooting.Went and found a video of the meeting this morning. Definitely some misinformation/exaggeration being spread.
First guy questioned people "shooting at a deer up on a hill" and wondering where those bullets are going to go. Again, this is training. A skyline shot is dangerous with a shotgun just as much as with a rifle and shouldn't be taken.
First guy talks of shotguns with scopes killing effectively at 200+ yards. Not to say this can't happen, but that's a damn good shot with a shotgun. I wouldn't call it the "norm". I've heard stories of my uncles in the olden days and some shots made with a bead at long distances..doesn't mean it's common or should be done.
Second guy said a person could set up a tower blind and have an effective range of almost a mile in any direction. "1000 yard shots aren't uncommon anymore." Again, I'm sure there are a select few who might take a long shot, but it would not be common. And this isn't the west. At least where I'm seeing deer long distance during hunting season, they are typically on the move and not just standing around waiting for you to set up.
I think this is a lesson for you western folks to get your crap together and learn to shoot. Us midwesterners will be making 1000 yard shots on running deer regularly.
Even if they are - as it seems to be what all the lemmings say it is where i live - im not sure why anyone cares if the biologists say its sustainable."Every small buck out there will get shot" seems to be a common theme among the opposition.
No change in seasons are proposed.Are the firearm seasons going to have the same days to hunt and dates that were originally slug only?
Correction...the legislature wanted this...the state (DNR) position was to avoid different regs by county.I agree, too many people that are not informed with a chance to persuade a decision. One county could have one individual who is extremely vocal using inaccurate information, anecdotal experiences, and hypothetical situations. Data and evidence should decide, not emotions. The state wanted to save grace, "the county can decide, we just gave the option".
Popular opinion...from bowhunters!Rifles during the rut are garbage. I don’t care where you live. Step in the wrong direction imo
Same with my Ithaca Deerslayer. Fairly rural where I live but limited to shotguns at home. I have no issue using them where rifles are allowed where I typically shoot deer. Good out to 150 or so and most of my shots are within 60.I tend to disagree. Make it too easy and it dwindles. Hunting is supposed to be a challenge with a slight chance of a reward if you do things right and get a little lucky. I don’t think the change from shotguns to rifles is going to be the deal-breaker, though. My Savage 220 really isn’t much different than a rifle at ranges most kids will be shooting.
No no.Popular opinion...from bowhunters!
Lots of bad info taken as fact on the topic.
Whats funny is the laugh reacts to this - while guided "hunts" that are shooting glorified farm animals get "liked" up all over media.as it should. Hunting has to compete with other sports, and things like video games. It needs to be easy and accessible for the vast majority, or it dwindles.