LopeHunter
Well-known member
A different perspective.
Stress kills. We have focused on reducing stress when is an option. By choice, we never had tenants. By choice, we never had employees.
Our goals also shifted as soared past middle age. We began to look at a glide path to retirement. During our mid-50s, we paid off our remaining mortgage balance. Having zero debt offered us significant peace of mind.
Keeping the mortgage or even opting to pull equity out of our home would have provided more funds to invest.
We were already maxed out on annual contributions to retirement accounts so any arbitrage of mortgage debt would end up aa investments inside our taxable investment accounts.
We use dividend reinvestment on existing investments which triggers immediate tax liability in taxable accounts so our expected post-tax return at our marginal tax rates over the remaining life of the mortgage was not going to be life-altering for us.
Capital preservation also popped up on our radar by our mid-50s so we began shifting our investment mix from virtually 100% stocks. That investment mix shift would reduce our expected net worth growth over our remaining lifetime.
We accepted this likely outcome as the increase in investment mix diversity gained a reduction in risk of sequence of returns during our upcoming critical initial decade of retirement.
We also sought out simplicity as reached our mid-50s. We rounded up “orphan” 401K accounts to consolidate at one brokerage. Managed bills online and used autopay more.
Reviewed our term life insurance which had served its main purpose when we had dependents and our net worth was much less. Premiums were increasing much faster than inflation as we hit 60 yet the only way to “win” was to die soon. The windfall would not be life-altering to the surviving souse in our case. We dropped all term life insurance and used the resulting savings into investment accounts.
Was our approach “smart”? Likely not, however, was a good fit for us to reduce stress and seek simplicity.
Stress kills. We have focused on reducing stress when is an option. By choice, we never had tenants. By choice, we never had employees.
Our goals also shifted as soared past middle age. We began to look at a glide path to retirement. During our mid-50s, we paid off our remaining mortgage balance. Having zero debt offered us significant peace of mind.
Keeping the mortgage or even opting to pull equity out of our home would have provided more funds to invest.
We were already maxed out on annual contributions to retirement accounts so any arbitrage of mortgage debt would end up aa investments inside our taxable investment accounts.
We use dividend reinvestment on existing investments which triggers immediate tax liability in taxable accounts so our expected post-tax return at our marginal tax rates over the remaining life of the mortgage was not going to be life-altering for us.
Capital preservation also popped up on our radar by our mid-50s so we began shifting our investment mix from virtually 100% stocks. That investment mix shift would reduce our expected net worth growth over our remaining lifetime.
We accepted this likely outcome as the increase in investment mix diversity gained a reduction in risk of sequence of returns during our upcoming critical initial decade of retirement.
We also sought out simplicity as reached our mid-50s. We rounded up “orphan” 401K accounts to consolidate at one brokerage. Managed bills online and used autopay more.
Reviewed our term life insurance which had served its main purpose when we had dependents and our net worth was much less. Premiums were increasing much faster than inflation as we hit 60 yet the only way to “win” was to die soon. The windfall would not be life-altering to the surviving souse in our case. We dropped all term life insurance and used the resulting savings into investment accounts.
Was our approach “smart”? Likely not, however, was a good fit for us to reduce stress and seek simplicity.