I’ll start out with disclosing I am new to hunting, and newly returned to shooting.
I’m considering upgrading my deer rifle (LH 308 Savage 11 trophy hunter w/Nikon prostaff, they were a package deal) either after this season, or the year after, and I’m trying get something of the lay of the land on how to interpret quality and marginal return for the money.
I’m a bassist, and it kinda seems like rifles may fall into similar price ranges as basses do. What I’m picking up looking around is rifles kinda shake out like
Intro/Starter = <$750
- Lack some features or lower quality, but will get the job done.
Intermediate = $750-$2000
- Good enough for most anything
Pro level =$2000-infinity
- Marginal return on investment in terms of measurable improvement down range the higher up you go, but they sure are pretty.
Is this a fair approximation of the break out?
My rifle firmly falls in the starter category, but it seems to shoot OK. My groups aren’t great, but that’s more on me.
My question then becomes: what features should I look for in this intermediate category to indicate better bang for your buck?
And lastly, what suggestions do you all have for a 308 that is either left handed or ambidextrous?
I know I should also (primarily?) upgrade my optic as well, but that’s a discussion for a different subforum.
Your assesment is about right on break out.
Things to look for that indicate a quality build:
1.) Wood to metal fit. Is the wood or metal extremely proud of the other one? Quality firearms have tight tolerances, and the wood to metal fit needs to reflect this level of detail if you are going to spend money in this price point.
2.) Smoothness of action: The Tikka is a smooth action. YOu don't feel binding when you work it, or grit when you cycle it. It feels like stainless on a bearing almost. A Ruger, on the otherhand, is a looser action, by design, and not quite a smooth as a Tikka, but is still a solid action due to manufacturing tolerances & final polishing & finish (In the Mark II, quality seems to have lessened on the Hawkeyes).
3.) Quality of stock material: With wood - look for better than average grain and make sure it's walnut, not beech or other species. The finish should be smooth to the touch, like they used 1000 grit paper for the finish sanding/polishing. it should not have flaking and it should be an oil finish, not a polymer or varnish, although modern varnish finishes are commonplace (albeit quite gauche).
4.) Metal finishing: No machine marks at all, and highly polished metal regardless of the finish. Smooth steel is good steel. Proper bluing finish with wood, or actual stainless with plastic, etc. Cerakote is fine, but it's not something that indicates increased quality as it's a cheap to apply finish.
5.) Guaranteed accuracy. Any rifle that you drop over $1K on should come with a guarantee of accuracy for at least 1.5 MOA. There is no reason to accept poor accuracy in a newly built firearm. This also helps you deal with the factory if your gun won't shoot, so you protect your investment.
6.) Your scope needs to be high quality and not the last thing you think of. Leupold Vx3HD remains the best bang for the buck re: quality versus cost, but the VX5HD is the clear winner once you step up a level. For a 308, I'd go with a 2.5x8 VX3 or the 2x10 VX5.
Brands:
Tikka, Ruger, Browning, Montana Rifle Company, Weatherby, Sako, Remington all make quality Left handed bolt guns. For lever guns, the BLR, Winchester 95 would be my go to options rather than the Henry, but I'm picky about levers.
For the bolt, my top three would be: MT Rifle, Ruger, Browning.