Glen Canyon

I had - somehow - forgotten that such a significant portion of CO's water rights are completely consumptive in that they are relocated out of basin. That's actually a pretty huge impact on the overall decreased flow. Though I suppose that's no different than Vegas or Cali. I just can't imagine that occurring in WA.
 
Last edited:
I had - somehow - forgotten that such a significant portion of CO's what rights are completely consumptive in that they are relocated out of basin. That's actually a pretty huge impact on the overall decreased flow. Though I suppose that's no different than Vegas or Cali. I just can't imagine that occurring in WA.

drop in the bucket compared to intra basin irrigated consumptive use.

off the top of my head i'd guess it's like 600,000 AF that leaves the colorado river basin in colorado for front range municipalities and farmers in the form of "transmountain diversion"

i guess i should just "AI" what the number actually is...
 
Last edited:
drop in the bucket compared to intra basin irrigated consumptive use.

off the top of my head i'd guess it's like 600,000 AF that leaves the colorado river basin in colorado for front range municipalities and farmers

i guess i should just "AI" what the number actually is...
Fair enough. But still a shit load of water.
CO Trans mountain: 580k af which is 3.3% of the total Upper Basins allocation. But only about 1/2 of the consumptive use of Lake Powell.
 
Rhett Larson here gives a pretty balanced take on the issues here, and he speaks more to a lay audience than the super nerds who are involved in it daily. My lower basin friend said it was a pretty measured take and I don't disagree

 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
118,459
Messages
2,194,933
Members
38,558
Latest member
Waddeesay
Back
Top