Frank Church Wilderness to allow chain saws......

Worked at Whataburger in high-school. About twice a week my very nice yet morbidly obese vice principal would come in get a triple meat triple cheeseburger with a large fry and diet coke. It's like going 70mph towards a ledge and hitting the breaks 6 feet away. At that point just send it full tilt man.
you know you’ve had a good bite to eat when you feel your arteries contract with each bite.
 
No funding. They look for volunteers and IMO, that's a bad precedent to set.

Its asking a lot for Backcountry Horsemen, etc. to do that kind of work. They're volunteers, not hired staff.
People don’t understand that having volunteers often requires full time positions to dedicate their full time to that volunteer mission from finding qualified volunteers to training to be compliant on equipment for your org, to supervising and finally fixing their #*^@#* ups. Volunteers look good on paper.
 
I'm not convinced we even need trails in wilderness areas.

Counterpoint:

We have small wilderness areas inside the National Lakeshore which go through swamps, sensitive habitats, etc. The trails in there help ensure the biotic community's resilience. In a lot of areas, trails are about keeping people off of sensitive areas so they don't get pummeled with erosion, off-trail pioneering, etc.

Human impact in Wilderness exists, regardless of the notion of it being untrammeled. If you don't manage that impact you are not managing for the wild characteristics you want to keep.
 
Counterpoint:

We have small wilderness areas inside the National Lakeshore which go through swamps, sensitive habitats, etc. The trails in there help ensure the biotic community's resilience. In a lot of areas, trails are about keeping people off of sensitive areas so they don't get pummeled with erosion, off-trail pioneering, etc.

Human impact in Wilderness exists, regardless of the notion of it being untrammeled. If you don't manage that impact you are not managing for the wild characteristics you want to keep.
Interesting. You mean if the designated trail systems were to become unusable you’d want to make sure they were made useable to avoid creation of alternate trails through vulnerable habitat??? Weird. Sounds similar to an effort currently underway in another area.
But I forgot, you’re dead set against it since I might mean temporary use of efficient equipment.
You’re making the same exact argument that the chainsaw folks are.
 
Meh, with the problems at hand now, chainsaws are the least of our public land problems.
 
That's akin to saying "I'm trying to lose weight so I am giving up eating apples at 30 calories a piece", instead of maybe cutting back on the 2 pizzas you eat....
Not really. just fiscal management with limited available funds. Spend it wisely . Get the biggest bang for your buck.
 
Interesting. You mean if the designated trail systems were to become unusable you’d want to make sure they were made useable to avoid creation of alternate trails through vulnerable habitat??? Weird. Sounds similar to an effort currently underway in another area.
But I forgot, you’re dead set against it since I might mean temporary use of efficient equipment.
You’re making the same exact argument that the chainsaw folks are.

Yeah, no.

I'm responding to the notion that we shouldn't have any trails in wilderness.
 
I feel for both sides. The blowdowns this year are stunning. But I also understand the problem of slippery slopes and politicians who like shortcuts. Chainsaws this year. What is next? Not long ago, I was backpacking in a "wilderness" park in Canada. Arrived at an alpine valley to see blue diesel smoke rising from a patch of subalpine fir, followed by the purr of an engine. Parks Canada had helicoptered in an excavator to do trailwork. Of course, Parks Canada also builds towns and ski resorts in their national parks. IF we had the funding and the political will we could clear those trails with traditional tools, just like we built them. But the political will seems to be pushing the opposite way.
 
Back
Top