SAJ-99
Well-known member
You going for my title of HT Bleeding-heart Liberal?I can't go quite as far as @SAJ-99's "suck it up buttercup" position, but do wonder where the balance is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You going for my title of HT Bleeding-heart Liberal?I can't go quite as far as @SAJ-99's "suck it up buttercup" position, but do wonder where the balance is.
Better to flip a mountain upside down, strip mine it to the point that it is a perpetual lake of toxic waste, and then turn it into a tourist attraction. Best of all worlds.
Jokes aside, tourism is truly a double-edged sword. It can give an economically depressed community a much needed boost (think hunting, which is a big seasonal economic boon to so many rural communities), and it also relies upon the maintenance of the thing people are there to see: preserving the natural wonders/opportunity are necessary to drive the tourism. And if a state is smart enough to implement a sales tax, tourism really helps the residents.
On the flip side, when people decide they no longer want to be tourists, but instead move to the place they went to to "get away from it all," they seem to bring "it all" with them. Along with preconceived and inaccurate expectations about the place they are moving to (Yellowstone effect). They displace the locals and change the culture to their taste, often driving out multiple generations of good stewards, institutional memory, and all sense of community. Insidious is the perfect word for it @Nameless Range.
I can't go quite as far as @SAJ-99's "suck it up buttercup" position, but do wonder where the balance is. Historically, too, western states have always been a story of tourism, extraction, and displacement, so is this really anything new?