Millsworks
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 854
Do you have to be an expert hunter to have an opinion?
Is all information written in outdoor mags, books and all state statistics, and record book entries worthless information for planning a hunt?
Maybe you gotta have a cool form name like super wapiti Wacker and stacker to have an opinion on elk hunting.
I think I should be able to put my two cents in if I want to try to help someone out or if I just want to.
I've been told that if you've never hunted a state then you don't have the right to voice an opinion on anything that you hunt there.
I personally feel my time is better spent trying to help someone if I think I can.
Some apparently disagree.
Maybe a hunt forum is here just for sad people to look for someone to try and argue with or piss off just for fun.
Maybe we can all learn from what others think . Even if we disagree with their opinions.
My opinions are based not just on personal experience, but research done by talking to those that have experience and reading various articles written by some respected outdoorsman. A few posts from threads like those on these hunt forums have some great info also.
But it's all opinion.
An opinion based on what you know to the best of your knowledge is all anyone can give.
Too bad we can't always be right .
If I've given some one bad or incorrect info I apologise sincerely. But to my knowledge I have given correct and sincere opinions from what I know.
I don't and never will claim to be an expert.
Does that mean that my opinion doesn't matter?
Should we all be an accredited monster buck taking, 400 inch elk killing , all outdoor professors to be allowed to speak our mind on a hunt forum?
Maybe we should all take some type of test first.
What do you guys think?
Let's here your opinions.
Maybe we should spend our time surfing for misspelled words and bad Grammer.
Hope any misspelled word or unpopular opinion I've posted here or anywhere else hasn't ruined to many hunting carears out there.
What do you guys think?
Is all information written in outdoor mags, books and all state statistics, and record book entries worthless information for planning a hunt?
Maybe you gotta have a cool form name like super wapiti Wacker and stacker to have an opinion on elk hunting.
I think I should be able to put my two cents in if I want to try to help someone out or if I just want to.
I've been told that if you've never hunted a state then you don't have the right to voice an opinion on anything that you hunt there.
I personally feel my time is better spent trying to help someone if I think I can.
Some apparently disagree.
Maybe a hunt forum is here just for sad people to look for someone to try and argue with or piss off just for fun.
Maybe we can all learn from what others think . Even if we disagree with their opinions.
My opinions are based not just on personal experience, but research done by talking to those that have experience and reading various articles written by some respected outdoorsman. A few posts from threads like those on these hunt forums have some great info also.
But it's all opinion.
An opinion based on what you know to the best of your knowledge is all anyone can give.
Too bad we can't always be right .
If I've given some one bad or incorrect info I apologise sincerely. But to my knowledge I have given correct and sincere opinions from what I know.
I don't and never will claim to be an expert.
Does that mean that my opinion doesn't matter?
Should we all be an accredited monster buck taking, 400 inch elk killing , all outdoor professors to be allowed to speak our mind on a hunt forum?
Maybe we should all take some type of test first.
What do you guys think?
Let's here your opinions.
Maybe we should spend our time surfing for misspelled words and bad Grammer.
Hope any misspelled word or unpopular opinion I've posted here or anywhere else hasn't ruined to many hunting carears out there.
What do you guys think?