I said I'd update if Dr. Frank's models changed significantly. Well they have with new data coming out and the latest projection I saw was about 6,000 US Deaths. As more data comes out this will likely change again. Not trying to hide anything. It is not totally unlike a weather forecast. Where on Sunday it shows a 80% chance of rain for Friday. Well by Wednesday the rain chance for Friday may have dropped to 20%. That is a big difference. The weather man isn't clueless. That is just the weather man using the most current data they have to try and forecast what will happen in the future. Much the same with Dr. Frank. His models are a forecast using the most current data. Not perfect and changing daily. I'm still looking for more models. If anyone has any different ones that are current and regularly updated, please post.
For perspective, The imperial College of London (who's model many governments used to set their corona policy) as late as March 17th estimated the US would have 1.1 Million Deaths, even if we used more ambitious mitigation (social distancing) measures. For the record, I don't think either one of the models is being produced by Quacks. I think they are likely both done by well meaning geniuses looking at different data to come up with vastly different conclusions. It is still yet to be seen which one will end up closer. For everyone's sake I sure hope it is the lower one.
Research and data on Global Health Policy from KFF, the leading health policy organization in the U.S.
www.kff.org
If Britain and the United States pursued more-ambitious measures to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus, to slow but not necessarily stop the epidemic over the coming few months, they could reduce mortality by half, to 260,000 people in the United Kingdom and 1.1 million in the United States…” (Booth, 3/17).