Curious on what fwp could use the funds for when Montana mule deer biggest issue is over harvest? I’d think 15 minutes with a computer editing regulations could fix mule deer issues way more than any raffle ever could in Montana.
Just off the top of my head:
1.) Wildlife crossings. This issue is ripe for expansion in MT due to federal funds coming through to help ensure migration corridors and wildlife overpasses are part of the overall conversation. In areas of high mule deer densities, this funding could be used as a state match to help enact this program.
2.) Mule deer studies: R1 is having significant issues that are far different than R3 or 4. Using studies to look at food quality, forage quantity, loss of winter range and predation effects is always helpful, as it is in other districts.
3.) Noxious weed eradication - especially cheatgrass
4.) Habitat restoration through conifer removal and woody veg regeneration. This can be done across landownership and in conjunction with groups like MDF in an effort to maximize dollars spent and create a match to increase funding by using state, private and federal habitat restoration dollars and programs.
5.) Conservation easement/Conservation Leasing/Conservation land purchases: In many instances, the difference between getting these projects done and losing the opportunity can come down to $10K here or there. Having funds aside specifically for the enhancement and preservation of mule deer habitat is a solid thing to have.
The allocation issue is being addressed already. 90% cut in antlerless permits for 23/24 along with no mule deer doe hunting in R6 & 7 for 2024/possibly 25. SB 281 from last session limits the largest growth in NR allocation - B tags - to no more than 2 if you hold a B10 or B11 and only 1 if you do not hold a combo tag.
Season structure is the other big thing, and that's an advocacy issue. I have zero doubts that MTBHA will be in that mix with their offerings both at the legislature and at the commission.
sign me up
