If you have him on Fb, @Nameless Range, could make that map for for you with the overlap area calculated to the gnat’s ass in 3D.
He's got skilz for sure. I do have a map-maker when I really need it, and another very active HT member has offered to do GIS work as well.
They aren't anti-hunting, I know that for a fact. Hell, Joe Gutkoski is 92 and still packs out his own elk. They don't believe the Greenhorn herd is large enough to support hunting, which is their opinion and is no more "anti-hunting" than saying you are against shoulder seasons. I've never heard them speak of eliminating unlimited hunting, but I may have missed that conversation.They’re probably not invited because they are anti hunting. They want to see hunting eliminated in all sheep herds <100 animals, that has seemed to be their bigger interest in the last few years, stopping hunting. I believe 1 tag is currently given for the Greenhorn herd.
All unlimited herds are individually under 100.
I do like the idea of them suing to remove domestic growers in sheep habitat when other methods are unsuccessful. More of that, less attacks on hunting.
I think the more obnoxious litigators definitely have a valuable place if WSF is going to be diplomatic. People can be sued when they need sued and WSF doesn’t look like the bad guy to what is a wool industry with a disgusting amount of power representative to their size.