Hi Bill I agree yes it was a “flaw” ... Maybe with a little more engineering or changing the design and possibly costing a few dollars more per rifle ...a death (or more) could have been avoided...and yes people are human .. flaws and all..
Remember the Pinto...


On a positive note the three gentlemen that I knew.. they’re 700s were accurate
Stay well Be Safe
Hmmm,
I went on the internet last night looking for a 722 Remington to buy in .257 Roberts,,,like the one I had so many years ago. ( In my post I said it was a 721, my error.) I found one for a whopping $1,000 plus. Not going there. There are too many other rifles I could buy for that amount of money.
I did get the warm and fuzzy gun buying rush looking at a very clean 722 for $599 in Savage 300. I never had that caliber,,,at last count I have bought about 55 centerfire rifles in the past 55 years of my buying guns. I am 73.
I had a friend,,,Native American whose only rifle was a ,300 Savage,,,in a Savage 99. Great match. I decided agaisnt getting the 722. I am like a big old brown trout now,,,,very selective on what I bite on.
My time with my 722 has come and gone. Pretty foolish to chase history thinking it is current affairs.
I do admire the 722, nd 721 Remington rifles,,,very much actually. I read all about the genious mechanical engineer nameed Mike Walket who was the father of this rifle,,,which became the model 700.
The critcical pary was the tiny extrator,,,the entire project was hinged on this one part,,,it worked well, even though I had to replace several on 700's I shot an awful lot, like my 700 in 35 Whelen with light loads of pistol bullets. Many thousands of rounds I fired in that rifle.
When the models 722 and 721 first came out they were selling for $97 and change,,, and they were a money maker. Winchester Model 70's were going for $118 and were loosing money big time.
Remington saved about 5 cents/rifle not using the orignal safety design of Mike Walker.
People are human,,,but not corporations. Our big mistake has been granting orporations "human standing"
The 721 and 722 were still a honest rifle. At first Remington did not know about the safety desigin flaw. Innocence was there. They represented American innovation at it's best,,,the fully enclosed bolt face was a tremendous safety feature in case of case head separation. I loved the plain walnut stock,,,Then somewhere along that rifles journery,,,,the flaw was discovered and the corporate mindset took over.
Accuarcy was the quality that allowed them to still be forgiven. There are lots of accurate rifles/brands.
Bill Ruger,,,a human being,,, built a stellar reputation for his firearms and his company. I reall admire him.
For me,,,what I kill with, it is imortant that this tool,,,I hate the word "weapon" for a hunting rifle, we are not at war with wildlife,,needs to be an honest tool, something with not just good, but with great Mojo.
Simply being accuarate is so totally not enough. I know a lot of accuarate people with dark hearts. I do not want to go afield with any rifle that incorporates a dark corporate heart, that accepts a dangerous flaw. That was so disrespectful to me as a huneter.
The big mistake so many people make in their lives is selling out some real decent human quality in themselves and replacing it with "something more practical". more efficient.
There is absolutely nothiing either practical, cost effective or efficient about hunting for meat.
Enjoy your day
MR