Anybody Buying Yet? Where’s the Bottom?

Saw that yesterday. Made me laugh. With all respect to @Big Fin, the anaysis is flawed at best, and why the impact of most things are cut off at 10yrs. I just don't know how to make it better and certainly not how to make it correct. The analysis is correct by accounting or actuarial standards, but definitely going to be wrong because the future is largely unknown and there are a lot of moving pieces. In this case the future payout promises are more known than the future inflows, which are not promised, so they get counted. The whole thing gets skewed. Here is the summary of numbers from the article. I should be pretty clear there are some things missing. The whole thing is crazy. I assume the GAO has a big excel spreadsheet they do this on every year and no one wants to change it.

Even the GAO says the path is unsustainable. The path is measured by debt to GDP and I'm not sure GDP is the right measurement. If the goal is to tax as little of the pieces of GDP as possible then it is for sure the wrong denominator. Maybe Fins suggestion of debt per capital is a better measurement. I just don't want to tell all the people getting tax refunds on overtime and tips that their net financial position actually got worse.

Screenshot 2026-03-24 at 8.23.17 AM.png
 
I just don't want to tell all the people getting tax refunds on overtime and tips that their net financial position actually got worse.
This is actually my biggest complaint, we've traded adults for whores. We need leaders that don't buy votes with reduced taxes on OT but flat out tell people, all tax breaks are going away, you're going to pay 10k more than you did last year, and that just is what it is. You also don't get SS until you're 75, the DoD gets a 40% budget reduction, and every other department needs to plan on 5% reductions every year for 4 years.

Instead we have these whores telling us how great America is while we spiral into corrupt doom, one tweet at a time.
 
There is another alternative. You could trim the position. In your defense, I didn't like oil stocks up yesterday with oil down -10%. That isn't healthy. ditto gold and gold miners. I expect lots of volatility in these spaces. I'm more concerned about trends in overall economy and ultimate demand. 2025 was slow. 2026 looks anemic.
Lots of volatility. Wall Street is the new Las Vegas. Gamblers don't look at silly things like demand, the way an investor would.
 
But not convinced enough to buy?
I have enough eggs in that basket, I think.

I met a good friend this morning, and we ran our bird dogs from horseback. Then we ate lunch in Columbus. I noticed the Town Pump truck stop had diesel at $4.749/gallon. I did not see the price, today, in Laurel.
 
There is obvious insider information being used to make hundreds of millions of dollars repeatedly on significant "bets" for the upcoming price movement up/down of stocks, bonds and oil. Bets are placed then the President makes a tweet or comment to the Press and the prices move so the bets are huge winners.

You are not building wealth since you are not tipped off with the insider information and your family may have actually been harmed since bets are a net zero game. For someone to win a crooked bet, someone else lost.

People should go to prison yet how many of us, after watching so few criminals face convictions after the 2008 market crisis, think even one person will be punished? This is our new normal. I feel as though we have circled back in time when Americans were cheering on the exploits of John Dillinger as well as Bonnie and Clyde. Breaking laws with a wink then plausible denial allows us to feel like we are part of the winning, too, though is actually at our own family's detriment as inflation and reduction of government services become apparent.

My level of consumer confidence is down so have throttled back discretionary spending by $10,000s for the rest of this year. Not because I have to tighten the belt but I would like more certainty over how the economy will perform the next three years of this presidential term. Stagflation is a threat with a possible Fed increase in interest rates the next prudent move. I have doubts the incoming Fed Chairman will act prudently as a Fed rate cut will boost the economy though a few months later turbo-charge inflation which already has the tailwinds of the rising oil "tax" hitting every item that gets transported before you buy it. If oil is used to make the item such as fertilizer or diesel then even more oil "tax" hits your wallet.

My level of investor confidence is down until we extract ourselves from these new wars and the inflation eases along with employment levels getting healthier. Long-term confidence is bullish.

I am once again fully invested after two years where had a significant chunk of cash on the sideline as a result of a home sale and what was my final 18-months of take home pay before retired. Bought some real estate last fall to hopefully perform well if inflation heats up the next few years. The rest was deployed starting last December via four monthly buys of a mix of low-fee big-bucket EFTs, TIPS and a 7-year bond ladder.

I look forward to the stock market being boring again. Now that I am fully invested again, I will exert no effort to check investment valuations except at the end of each month as update a spreadsheet of our asset holdings. I was never a trader. Never much of a casino visitor, either. Happy to tap out singles in the market rather than swing for the fences. I am a smart person but I was in grad school with much sharper people who I trust will see grandslam opportunities before I could. Or, they get a tip from the Whitehouse.

This has happened numerous times over the last year, particularly on tariff TACOs. Glad someone else is noticing. Unfortunately it is not the SEC.


IMG_2609.jpeg
 
This has happened numerous times over the last year, particularly on tariff TACOs. Glad someone else is noticing. Unfortunately it is not the SEC.


View attachment 404680
I saw a similar post in regards to Polymarket about the ceasefire. So apparently it’s legal to bet with insider information but not trade? Pretty messed up we can make bets to make money on wars that involve humans dying IMO.
 
Wait, what? Are you saying fiscal conservatives exist? I was dang sure they were extinct.
I've certainly met plenty of them both here and in person.
I saw a similar post in regards to Polymarket about the ceasefire. So apparently it’s legal to bet with insider information but not trade? Pretty messed up we can make bets to make money on wars that involve humans dying IMO.
It'll keep happening until the masses revolt
 

Forum statistics

Threads
118,697
Messages
2,203,178
Members
38,624
Latest member
WINCRAFT
Back
Top