If they're checking out, that's their choice. Let them go.
I also agree that hunters are a shrinking group, in particular those that care more about wildlife and public lands beyond running a bullet or hook through an animal. But, that's always been the case.
Also why I'm more inclined to engage with hikers, mountain bikers, rock climbers, campers, hell even atv groups to advocate for public lands. They find value in public lands, more so than hunters/fisherman these days. I don't feel like the exposure to hunting and trying to increase awareness to sportsmen/women has worked at all. In fact, it's quite the opposite.
It's created angst, feelings of NR entitlements to wildlife that isn't theirs, etc. etc.
Time to move a different direction and why I've changed my position regarding NR opportunity. I used to wrongly believe if more NR hunters got to experience public land hunting we would gain advocates. That didn't work, it just turned into entitlement.
So, I switched to favoring resident opportunity because they are the most passionate about hunting AND public lands both. I think combining increased resident opportunity AND finding new public land advocates that don't even hunt and fish is the best path forward.
IMO/E, giving more and more opportunity away to NR's has been a horrible return on investment in regard to creating advocates.
Some may disagree, but the faces never change for those actually in the trenches doing the work.