MinnesotaHunter
Well-known member
Surely good genetics, but he does look young and he looks barely (or maybe not quite) outside his ears. Not saying I wouldn't shoot him on the right tag, but if you have a bigger option, I would probably be focusing my efforts that direction. I am not a very experienced field judge, so my opinion on his score is probably pointless, but with him still having on velvet and being real wide I think I might say mid 150s. It wouldn't shock me to hear that he is a 2.5 year old with good genetics.