Watering Down Endngered Species Act

"Individuals and industries may kill endangered animals in the course of logging projects, developments and other activities, it said — so long as the activity’s purpose isn’t killing species."

Why wasn't this already the rule? I think most of us know that the opposite is really the issue. That is, if you might possibly kill any endangered species, you can't do anything.
 
"Progress" comes at a cost. How else are we supposed to keep giving handouts to every street corner democrat?

End the handouts and we can talk about saving the tree frogs...
 
"Progress" comes at a cost. How else are we supposed to keep giving handouts to every street corner democrat?

End the handouts and we can talk about saving the tree frogs...

I think your post is both a little tongue in cheek and a critique. But, I'm honestly curious what kind of progress do you envision or reference here that is worth the permanent loss of biodiversity, albiet a frog?
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
120,098
Messages
2,249,662
Members
39,092
Latest member
jgarren
Back
Top