I am for more new wilderness, but would like to see things other than 'goat rocks' being put into wilderness. A wilderness area that goes from sagebrush flats/hills through all the different veg types to the goat rocks would be cool. My problem is that we don't have more of the more productive land in wilderness.
I can't say that I would be against a newly designated wilderness now, anywhere if it still has wilderness characteristics. The newly designated Cedar Mtns wilderness in No. UT is a joke. Mostly a range full of cheatgrass and was mostly only formed to stop/slow importation of nuke waste to the nearby indian reservation. To me that's not worth the paper the document was printed on.
Wilderness designation could be reversed in the future if the resources there were 'needed'. However, you can't make more land with wilderness characteristics.