Caribou Gear Tarp

Please share far and wide!

azdesertrat

New member
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
5
Location
boonies,AZ
OUTDOOR CHANNEL PULLS PRODUCTION FROM COLORADO DUE TO CO. SENATE BETRAYING 2ND RIGHTS!

PLEASE SHARE FAR AND WIDE! - From: Michael Bane,

Subject: OUTDOOR CHANNEL Pulls Productions from Colorado

Dear Senator King;

I met you yesterday after the so-called "public hearings" on the antigun bills; as I mentioned, I am an Executive Producer for OUTDOOR CHANNEL. I currently have four series in production, included GUN STORIES, the top show on OC, with several additional series in development. My series focus on guns, hunting, shooting and the outdoors.

This morning I met with my three Producers, and we made the decision that if these antigun bills become law, we will be moving all of our production OUT of Colorado. We have already cancelled a scheduled filming session for late this month. Obviously, part of this is due to our own commitment to the right to keep and bear arms, but it also reflects 3 lawyers' opinions that these laws are so poorly drafted and so designed to trap otherwise legal citizens into a crime (one of our attorneys referred to them as "flypaper laws") that it is simply too dangerous for us to film here.

I can give you chapter and verse on the legal implications if you need, but suffice to say that the first legal opinion was so scary we went out and got two others. Al three attorneys agreed.

We are relatively small potatoes in television, but our relocation of production will cost Colorado a little less than a million dollars in 2013.

Secondly, we have proudly promoted Colorado in our productions (and have been moving more and more production into the state); now we will do exactly the opposite. What does this mean for Colorado? The community of television producers is a small one. Last week I had lunch with a major network producer who was looking to locate his new reality series in Colorado. That producer is also a shooter, and the new reality series will now be based out of Phoenix. That lunch cost Colorado over a million in economic impact.

Thirdly, according to numbers I received from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (for whom I used to work) yesterday, hunting had an almost $800,000 impact on Colorado in 2012, driving as many as 8330 jobs. Next month I will be in Texas meeting with most of the top outdoor/hunting producers, and the Number One agenda item will be Colorado. Already, hunting organizations and statewide hunting clubs around the country are pulling out of Colorado, and we expect this trend to accelerate rapidly.

The message we will take to our viewers and listeners is that these proposed laws are so dangerous to hunters and any other person, be he a fisherman or a skier who brings a handgun into the state for self-defense, that we cannot recommend hunting, fishing or visiting Colorado. We reach millions of people, and, quite frankly, we have a credibility that Colorado government officials can no longer match. Colorado Division of Wildlife is already running ads trying to bring more out-of-state hunters to Colorado...in light of the flood of negative publicity about these proposed laws, I can assure you those ads will fail.

We estimate that as many as one-quarter to one-third of out-of-state hunters will desert Colorado in the next 18-24 months, which will quite frankly be a disaster for the hunting industry in Colorado and have a devastating effect on our western and northern communities (certainly like Grand Junction).

This is not a "boycott" in the traditional sense of a centralized, organized operation; rather, it is more of a grassroots decision on where shooters, hunters and other sportsmen are willing to spend their money. Look at the collapse of the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show in February. That venerable multimillion dollar trade show chose to ban modern sporting rifles and standard capacity magazines, and with three weeks it collapsed as all vendors and sponsors pulled out.

Colorado is going to pay a huge price for laws that will do nothing. Thank you, sir, for your support.

Michael Bane - OUTDOOR

(Grabed this from my local hunting site just doin my part to spread it far and wide)
 
The title of that release is pretty misleading.

Mr. Bane is now Outdoor Channel? He is a producer for OC, one of hundreds. He is not the publicly traded company that goes by OUTD on the NASDAQ.

OC is located in Temecula, California. If the network itself wanted to make a business statement about anti-gun legislators, seems they would have pulled roots and moved to a different state a long time ago.

Considering the shareholders of OC have agreed to be bought out by a Colorado company, Kroenke Sports and Entertainment, their connection to Colorado will get stronger, not weaker. Kroenke owns the Colorado Avalanche hocket team, Pepsi Center in Denver, Altitude Network, and many other Colorado based businesses.

Link here shows the recent mergers and acquisitions of Kroenke. You will see OC as one of those.

http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=6499912


Not sure how those Colorado roots reconcile with the supposed title of this thread. If I were to bet, I see more OC activity moving to Colorado for the potential efficencies, than I do exodus by Kroenke from Colorado for the reasons Mr. Bane mentions.

OC has an office in the greater Denver area where their director of programming is located. I would bet dollars to doughnuts that he is not moving, as one would think based on the title of this email. OC competes with other shows and networks for sponsorship with Colorado agencies, Tourism and CPW, based on their premise that they have offices in Colorado.

I appreciate what Mr. Bane is doing by taking this action. His show, a good show is all shooting and guns. I can see his reasons for doing this, given his business is strictly guns.

When it comes to boycotting hunting in Colorado, I disagree with Mr. Bane.

As I have stated on other threads, I don't intend to boycott Colorado with my hunting. The folks on the West Slope who rely on hunters are the best hope for some sanity with the Colorado gun laws. I will gladly boycott the Front Range areas and will do that, to the extent possible.

I am not going to kick my friends in the crotch because of something their enemies did to me.

Carry on .......
 
I would have ZERO states to hunt in if I drew a line anytime voters or politicians or F&G did something that harmed access to tags, public tracts of land or gun rights. UT tag grab by SFW. WY wilderness law for nonresident hunters but nonresident hikers can hike solo. NM cutting the heck out of DIY nonresident tags. My skin is thick. I fight the good fight. I do not scorch the earth based on a single battle lost. Boycotts create lots of collateral damage of good folks so I want to hear a good argument before I turn my back on an entire state.
 
More of this stuff posted on the wires this morning. Not sure if the reporters really look into the issue, or if they even care, so long as it makes for juicy controversy.

Am I the only one who finds humor in the big fuss the media is making of Outdoor Channel supposedly leaving Colorado, yet Outdoor Channel shareholders agred with management and voted to be bought out by a group based in Colorado?

Maybe I am not looking at it corrrectly, but if groups were so upset with Colorado to the point that they are leading the push for a boycott of the state, why would they not make mention of being bought out by a company from Colorado?

Let me get this straight. Some in the media are advocating that we should all boycott Colorado, hurting the many small businesses who rely on hunting and hunters. Yet, when they could make a big statement to one of the biggest financial enterprises in Colorado, these same groups in outdoor media say nothing when one of their own does just the opposite of what we are being asked to do.

Surely I am missing something. :confused:
 
Back
Top