Paul in Idaho
Well-known member
My only hunting rifle is a Ruger M77 .30-06 I bought about 20 years ago. I have been using an off-brand basic scope on it. It's time to upgrade.
I looked through the selection at Cabela's recently, and found that things have changed a lot! The employee helping me at Cabela's showed me Nikon and Leupold scopes with reticles that adapt for different ranges. I came here to learn more and found CDS 101 for dummies, and also found Leupold's CDS page.
Can you guys give me some input on a reasonable solution? I'm not a long-range hunter. My longest shot on game has been about 250 yards. However, I would like a reticle that could help me make accurate shots at 400-500 yards if I need a follow-up shot in open country. I want something that is easy to use, and doesn't require having a ballistics table taped to my gun. Some areas I hunt are fairly thick, so I don't want a scope with tall turrets sticking out on 3 sides to catch on branches.
I'd like to keep the price around $500, but if there's a compelling reason to spend more, I could wait to buy until I save up enough.
Thanks.
Paul
I looked through the selection at Cabela's recently, and found that things have changed a lot! The employee helping me at Cabela's showed me Nikon and Leupold scopes with reticles that adapt for different ranges. I came here to learn more and found CDS 101 for dummies, and also found Leupold's CDS page.
Can you guys give me some input on a reasonable solution? I'm not a long-range hunter. My longest shot on game has been about 250 yards. However, I would like a reticle that could help me make accurate shots at 400-500 yards if I need a follow-up shot in open country. I want something that is easy to use, and doesn't require having a ballistics table taped to my gun. Some areas I hunt are fairly thick, so I don't want a scope with tall turrets sticking out on 3 sides to catch on branches.
I'd like to keep the price around $500, but if there's a compelling reason to spend more, I could wait to buy until I save up enough.
Thanks.
Paul