Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So who was the interested party that got him to introduce it in the first place place?Well that was fast. I guess they had hundreds of phone calls opposing it in hours. View attachment 401918
You can bet they are going to try and ram it through when nobody is looking.So who was the interested party that got him to introduce it in the first place place?
It's politics, you'll probably never find outSo who was the interested party that got him to introduce it in the first place place?
It was ranchers that claim hunters are disrupting livestock using water on public land. Of course hunters will not remember these types of things come election seasonIt's politics, you'll probably never find out
I think that part is underlined so it's part of the new proposal, not currently in effect?So delimbing for a climbing tree stand is already a no-no?
I better scrub my social media pics.
Also strike-through on the original text.I think that part is underlined so it's part of the new proposal, not currently in effect?
Farm Bureau.So who was the interested party that got him to introduce it in the first place place?
I think that part is underlined so it's part of the new proposal, not currently in effect?
Seems they just moved it from (iii) ("trees are cut or altered"), to a subsection to make more clear. I think it's been that way for a long time -- that you can't cut or alter trees around the blind, or where you want to put one.
Ah yes see that now. The word "construct" doesn't seem like the best choice of words, could almost be interpreted as prefabricated hanging stands might not apply, they could have said "construct or place" and it would be more clear.Also strike-through on the original text.