These two are the R & D members running for Zinke's seat.
Gianforte has been running a radio ad where he tactically is using the terms, "Keep public lands in public's hands" and matching Pelosi to Quist as one and the same with respect to their very liberal ideology. Oh, not to forget Quist comment regarding the 2nd Amendment...
I plan to vote Quist as his stance is well understood over our public lands staying in public hands whereas Gianforte's use is a pretty deceptive way to attach himself to this line of thought. Gianforte's does not mention the intent to transfer to State and not discuss how much "public land stays in public's hands" as well as steam access, etc... Quist's 2nd Amendment position is crap. I would not vote for Quist based on this however, due to Gianforte's focused position on our lands and a House/Senate and Executive... along with a soon future Judicial R positions on the 2nd Amendment, Quist's position on 2nd amendment=Hunting thoughts will not go anywhere what so ever... Biggest thing for Gianforte, he will enhance the R (GOP's) platform on the public lands topic...
I am not a fan of Quist's use of his 2nd Amendment ramblings... Counting the 2nd Amendment for hunting purpose and the interest to create additional laws (may we say redundant?) over the use of guns meant to kill people. Huh? My Glock 27 gen 4 is not meant to hunt... It is meant to kill people. He treads a line that easily can be a captive statement(s) used against him by the hard nosed R's... Speaking specifically of 2nd Amendment interests. Why Quist even needed to open this can is beyond me. He had the D's support w/o this spout off.
Anyhow, I've not heard a Quist radio advertisement yet... Not much for radio now a days though it says something when I've heard Gianforte's position / advertisement multiple times yet Quist? Got a feeling Gianforte will be our next Rep in Congress... Sad.
Gianforte has been running a radio ad where he tactically is using the terms, "Keep public lands in public's hands" and matching Pelosi to Quist as one and the same with respect to their very liberal ideology. Oh, not to forget Quist comment regarding the 2nd Amendment...
I plan to vote Quist as his stance is well understood over our public lands staying in public hands whereas Gianforte's use is a pretty deceptive way to attach himself to this line of thought. Gianforte's does not mention the intent to transfer to State and not discuss how much "public land stays in public's hands" as well as steam access, etc... Quist's 2nd Amendment position is crap. I would not vote for Quist based on this however, due to Gianforte's focused position on our lands and a House/Senate and Executive... along with a soon future Judicial R positions on the 2nd Amendment, Quist's position on 2nd amendment=Hunting thoughts will not go anywhere what so ever... Biggest thing for Gianforte, he will enhance the R (GOP's) platform on the public lands topic...
I am not a fan of Quist's use of his 2nd Amendment ramblings... Counting the 2nd Amendment for hunting purpose and the interest to create additional laws (may we say redundant?) over the use of guns meant to kill people. Huh? My Glock 27 gen 4 is not meant to hunt... It is meant to kill people. He treads a line that easily can be a captive statement(s) used against him by the hard nosed R's... Speaking specifically of 2nd Amendment interests. Why Quist even needed to open this can is beyond me. He had the D's support w/o this spout off.
Anyhow, I've not heard a Quist radio advertisement yet... Not much for radio now a days though it says something when I've heard Gianforte's position / advertisement multiple times yet Quist? Got a feeling Gianforte will be our next Rep in Congress... Sad.
Last edited: