Montana Regional Caps and Limited Entry for Mule Deer.

Leave the season dates the same, primitive weapon the last three weeks for deer. Get rid of Xmas muzzy and youth season. Cap nr regionally based off deer population and huntable acres. Break the nr allocation into public and private land tags. My ideal season and montana would have the best hunting in the west. Maybe not the best killing though.
 
Last edited:
If you have the age structure and hunting quality I think the revenue will take care of itself. Look at wyoming and they don't even have "that great" of mule deer hunting. Just an observation from a nobody NR.
How many NR deer tags does WY issue?
 
How many NR deer tags does WY issue?
Off the top of my head is it 15% ? I don't remember. Age structure doesn't give a shit about your license plate what matters is total tag numbers and pressure. It does however matter if you get shot at for 8 weeks straight, including the heart of the rut. This really isn't as complicated as some make it out to be. You can't please everyone, the sooner you care about the resource and less about the morons the better it'll get. They're gonna buy the tag regardless.
 
Off the top of my head is it 15% ? I don't remember. Age structure doesn't give a shit about your license plate what matters is total tag numbers and pressure. It does however matter if you get shot at for 8 weeks straight, including the heart of the rut. This really isn't as complicated as some make it out to be. You can't please everyone, the sooner you care about the resource and less about the morons the better it'll get. They're gonna buy the tag regardless.
I agree. Season length is a real problem.
 
I think we should just keep things the way they are until just seeing a mule deer on public land is noteworthy and an antlered buck a season maker. No doubt whitetails will fill the void.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That would make the most sense to start.

But it won't happen. Listening to the rock cast I would say this hunter group proposal is a moving target hard to say what they are after at one point the bucks didn't have a chance to get old enough now they are trying to say if they change the season more deer will be more accessible to hunters oh And camper technology has advanced to much allowing hunters to hunt later into November.
 
Does anyone who hunts 6 and 7 have concern that regional caps set by population of deer per region have the potential to increase hunters in those two regions beyond what the numbers currently hunting?

Regions 6 and 7 contain about 32% of the total mule deer population and about 24% of the total amount of hunters.

By contrast region 3 hosts about 29% of the total amount of hunters. I’m not sure what percentage of the deer population are in region 3.
 
Does anyone who hunts 6 and 7 have concern that regional caps set by population of deer per region have the potential to increase hunters in those two regions beyond what the numbers currently hunting?

Regions 6 and 7 contain about 32% of the total mule deer population and about 24% of the total amount of hunters.

By contrast region 3 hosts about 29% of the total amount of hunters. I’m not sure what percentage of the deer population are in region 3.
Not if you set it off harvest stats. I realize you are trying to protect your region.
 
Just guessing, but if you set regional caps off of harvest stats, I bet region 3 comes up with a reduction in numbers .
The great thing about region caps is they can be adjusted as needed. To many hunters cut tags back not enough add them in it may be a learning curve the first few years but it will work it self out.
 
The great thing about region caps is they can be adjusted as needed. To many hunters cut tags back not enough add them in it may be a learning curve the first few years but it will work it self out.
The wrench in that however is the statutory required number of nr tags so all you can do is move them between regions. When you make cuts to one region you would need to add those to a different region. I think that’s where Montanas system is hosed up compared to other states that do sonething similar like that such as Idaho.
 
The wrench in that however is the statutory required number of nr tags so all you can do is move them between regions. When you make cuts to one region you would need to add those to a different region. I think that’s where Montanas system is hosed up compared to other states that do sonething similar like that such as Idaho.
I could also see FWP setting the caps high, so that the caps for all 7 regions added up to more than the current number set in statute.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
118,237
Messages
2,185,993
Members
38,490
Latest member
aaz
Back
Top