From "Meat-eater" 5/26 Can Large Predators Control CWD

Mustangs Rule

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
1,202
I just came across this relatively recent article from meateater about large predators controlling CWD.

It is a good article, long but worthy of the read. I would offer the topic open for discussion to anyone who read it, it does offer new info.

 
You’re right, it is a long article, and I’ll admit I usually despise anything written by rinella. My limited understanding of prions is that almost nothing can kill them, so I would be skeptical of the claim that they are not being spread more in the feces of the predators.
 
You’re right, it is a long article, and I’ll admit I usually despise anything written by rinella. My limited understanding of prions is that almost nothing can kill them, so I would be skeptical of the claim that they are not being spread more in the feces of the predators.
I know what you mean about Rinnella Inc. He is the Elvis of Hunting.

The relatively recent Mountain Lion prion study, which I believe was done by the Wyoming F and Game, or maybe the University of Wyoming, was conclusive. Mountain Lions are immune to CWD and their body chemistry typically totally destroys about 96.5 % of active prions consumed and the remaining 3.5% that are "alive" are pooped out quickly.

Scoring an "A +" on prion destruction with a one-time localized single poop-out they are not considered to be spreaders of CWD. Quite the opposite really.

I know of no such study on Wolves or coyotes. I will look for one. Getting that info would be so critical to this jigsaw puzzle.

Birds and reptiles like alligators are immune to CWD but their body chemistry does not denature prions.
 
This is a study done 11 years ago on coyote's body chemistry denaturing CWD Prions. It is qualitative not quantitative. All it does is state that active CWD prions get pooped out in coyotes.

What makes the Mt. Lion study/CWD-Prion Study so valuable is how numbers based it is. Do mountain lions poop out active CWD prions, yes, but only to the 4% level of how much they ate. 96 % of the CWD prions were denatured.

I wish we could get quantitative CWD-prion decomposition rates for both wolves and coyotes.

I used to live in Wyoming, First in SE Wyoming then in NW Wyoming. THe relationship between large predators, and % CWD was telling.

In SE Wyoming the CWD infection rate for deer hit 43%, no resident wolf populations. The Grey Bull River area CWD deer rate is 60% with no wolves.

The Jackson Area of Wyoming CWD rate is currently 10%, and the Wind River range has gone from 0% in the not-too-distant past to 10% CDW now. Both of these last two areas have been both wolf and lion heavy for many decades and also loaded with winter elk feeding grounds which are CWD and Elk hoof rot breeding grounds.


 
Last edited:
And also, there are some basic principles of immunity that certain animals have to diseases. Immunity usually does not happen by accident; it happens by prolonged exposure over time to pathogens.

That all these predators and scavengers have complete immunity to CWD prions is incredibly significant.

Again, such things do not happen by accident.
 
I used to live in Wyoming, First in SE Wyoming then in NW Wyoming. THe relationship between large predators, and % CWD was telling.

In SE Wyoming the CWD infection rate for deer hit 43%, no resident wolf populations. The Grey Bull River area CWD deer rate is 60% with no wolves.

The Jackson Area of Wyoming CWD rate is currently 10%, and the Wind River range has gone from 0% in the not-too-distant past to 10% CDW now. Both of these last two areas have been both wolf and lion heavy for many decades and also loaded with winter elk feeding grounds which are CWD and Elk hoof rot breeding grounds.



Do you happen to know the deer populations for those areas?
 
This is a study done 11 years ago on coyote's body chemistry denaturing CWD Prions. It is qualitative not quantitative. All it does is state that active CWD prions get pooped out in coyotes.

What makes the Mt. Lion study/CWD-Prion Study so valuable is how numbers based it is. Do mountain lions poop out active CWD prions, yes, but only to the 4% level of how much they ate. 96 % of the CWD prions were denatured.

I wish we could get quantitative CWD-prion decomposition rates for both wolves and coyotes.

I used to live in Wyoming, First in SE Wyoming then in NW Wyoming. THe relationship between large predators, and % CWD was telling.

In SE Wyoming the CWD infection rate for deer hit 43%, no resident wolf populations. The Grey Bull River area CWD deer rate is 60% with no wolves.

The Jackson Area of Wyoming CWD rate is currently 10%, and the Wind River range has gone from 0% in the not-too-distant past to 10% CDW now. Both of these last two areas have been both wolf and lion heavy for many decades and also loaded with winter elk feeding grounds which are CWD and Elk hoof rot breeding grounds.


Great findings if you want fodder for the “eliminate hunting predators will fix it all” viewpoint.
 
And also, there are some basic principles of immunity that certain animals have to diseases. Immunity usually does not happen by accident; it happens by prolonged exposure over time to pathogens.

That all these predators and scavengers have complete immunity to CWD prions is incredibly significant.

Again, such things do not happen by accident.
CWD is not a pathogen. It does not act like a pathogen such as a virus or bacteria that an immune system recognizes and fights off. It's more analogous to a lock and key. The wrong kind of key won't fit in the lock. CWD doesn't go to work replicating in a system that can't accept it. The immune system isn't involved in CWD infections.
There are examples of prion diseases jumping the species barrier such as mad cow jumping to humans. Not common but can happen, most prion diseases are species specific. I actually think there is a lot of merit to the theory that CWD arose from housing captive deer along side scrape positive sheep. Scrape is a prion disease found in sheep.
 
Geriatric Opinion alert!

If this science says apex predators CAN control CWD, maybe the question is, "Why aren't they?"

I'm just a marginally well-read idiot. I'm not taking any victory laps on this science. The cited study is 11 years old? @Hunting Wife , is there anything here to get excited about?

As far as fodder for the anti-predator hunting crowd: California is still the favored test case for ending sport hunting of predators.
People use science that justifies their worldview. Sometimes they even distort it to fit.

One needs to broaden scope before making a conclusion based on one published study.

As an example:
One 2020 study concluded that California human/livestock incidents since Prop 117 were on par or less than comparable western states which allow sport hunting.(BTW - I can find no data in this study on cougar mortality via depredation permit kills.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339248912_The_Elephant_in_the_room_What_can_we_learn_from_California_regarding_the_use_of_sport_hunting_of_pumas_Puma_concolor_as_a_management_tool

Another study from 2023 concluded that human caused cougar kills in California continue to rise significantly since Prop 117. Their analysis showed that the largest human caused mortality rate is depredation permit kills.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10068828/

It kind of makes me wonder which "peers" reviewed the first study. Why ignore a major mortality vector?
Yes, the NIH study came later, but there was ample mainstream and social media coverage of the idea that "professional" cougar kills had replaced "sport" kills in California. This is actually a misrepresentation as well. USDA-WS did kill cats in California, but the livestock depredation loophole to Prop 117 allows livestock producers to apply for kill permits. So not all the cats killed since Prop 117 are USDA-WS kills, but include citizen kills on "non-sport" permits.

Since both depredation hunts and sport hunts employ the same methods, what is really the difference? I suggest it may be the hated word, "sport".

My point is that most anyone can find a study to say what they want to say. To use a metaphor that may upset the pure scientists, the truth is in the "Whole Counsel" of the canon of peer reviewed work.
 
In my humble opinion the idea of predators controlling CWD is a joke. In the CWD hotbed of central, SE, and NE Wyoming there’s no shortage of lions. One could also say the data says that humans are super predators that are immune to CWD…
 
CWD is not a pathogen. It does not act like a pathogen such as a virus or bacteria that an immune system recognizes and fights off. It's more analogous to a lock and key. The wrong kind of key won't fit in the lock. CWD doesn't go to work replicating in a system that can't accept it. The immune system isn't involved in CWD infections.
There are examples of prion diseases jumping the species barrier such as mad cow jumping to humans. Not common but can happen, most prion diseases are species specific. I actually think there is a lot of merit to the theory that CWD arose from housing captive deer along side scrape positive sheep. Scrape is a prion disease found in sheep.
Thank you, a lot of what you say is right on.
 
In my humble opinion the idea of predators controlling CWD is a joke. In the CWD hotbed of central, SE, and NE Wyoming there’s no shortage of lions. One could also say the data says that humans are super predators that are immune to CWD…
One of the facts about Wyoming is that predator populations vary greatly across the state and trying to pin down their effects on wildlife with blankets rules does not fit. I lived in both SE Wyoming and NW Wyoming, and the differences were in some cases like night and day.
 
Geriatric Opinion alert!

If this science says apex predators CAN control CWD, maybe the question is, "Why aren't they?"

I'm just a marginally well-read idiot. I'm not taking any victory laps on this science. The cited study is 11 years old? @Hunting Wife , is there anything here to get excited about?

As far as fodder for the anti-predator hunting crowd: California is still the favored test case for ending sport hunting of predators.
People use science that justifies their worldview. Sometimes they even distort it to fit.

One needs to broaden scope before making a conclusion based on one published study.

As an example:
One 2020 study concluded that California human/livestock incidents since Prop 117 were on par or less than comparable western states which allow sport hunting.(BTW - I can find no data in this study on cougar mortality via depredation permit kills.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339248912_The_Elephant_in_the_room_What_can_we_learn_from_California_regarding_the_use_of_sport_hunting_of_pumas_Puma_concolor_as_a_management_tool

Another study from 2023 concluded that human caused cougar kills in California continue to rise significantly since Prop 117. Their analysis showed that the largest human caused mortality rate is depredation permit kills.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10068828/

It kind of makes me wonder which "peers" reviewed the first study. Why ignore a major mortality vector?
Yes, the NIH study came later, but there was ample mainstream and social media coverage of the idea that "professional" cougar kills had replaced "sport" kills in California. This is actually a misrepresentation as well. USDA-WS did kill cats in California, but the livestock depredation loophole to Prop 117 allows livestock producers to apply for kill permits. So not all the cats killed since Prop 117 are USDA-WS kills, but include citizen kills on "non-sport" permits.

Since both depredation hunts and sport hunts employ the same methods, what is really the difference? I suggest it may be the hated word, "sport".

My point is that most anyone can find a study to say what they want to say. To use a metaphor that may upset the pure scientists, the truth is in the "Whole Counsel" of the canon of peer reviewed work.
I decline commenting because so much of what you are talking about goes beyond the scope of the Meat-Eater Article.
 
Great findings if you want fodder for the “eliminate hunting predators will fix it all” viewpoint.
Staying in the realm of diseases carried by wildlife, I was reading about bioremediation of Lymes disease. White- footed mice are a supper carrier of infected ticks. I read the average coyote consumes 1,800 mice per year,
which might suggest spare the coyote, but they also consume lots of foxes, weasels, mink and a host of the smallest predators which in total consume far more mice, which suggests kill the coyotes.

I have read that some parts of Europe which are suffering from high rates of lyme's disease are banning the trapping of the small predators which eat Lyme's carrying rodents
 
Do you happen to know the deer populations for those areas?

Do you happen to know the deer populations for those areas?
I just checked for the areas where I once lived, SE and NW Wyoming and they were both way down.

Three reasons were given, first was climate change, (The 2022-2023 terrible winter kill had the Climate Change fingerprint all over it) second was exploding CDW epidemics and in some areas EHD and the third was habitat fragmentation and degradation.
 
I just checked for the areas where I once lived, SE and NW Wyoming and they were both way down.

Three reasons were given, first was climate change, (The 2022-2023 terrible winter kill had the Climate Change fingerprint all over it) second was exploding CDW epidemics and in some areas EHD and the third was habitat fragmentation and degradation.

Do you know population number differences between the two areas
 

Forum statistics

Threads
120,187
Messages
2,252,855
Members
39,108
Latest member
birdmanhunter
Back
Top