I've received a lot of requests to delete this thread. I'd paraphrase a summary of those comments as "Showing dead feral cats is not good for the image of hunting."
As the owner of the forum, I get to make the final decision on those moderation requests. Moderating this one surely requires some factors to be weighed.
I do agree that showing dead feral cats will strike a chord with some as being abhorrent. Some will say that it is not hunting, rather pest control and has no place being associated with hunting. Some will say it offers ammunition for those who want to attack hunting.
Hard to deny any of those comments. I have to weigh moderation with the benefits of the discussion, also.
Benefits being, affirmation that feral cats are a huge problem, maybe to the same degree of non-native snakes in the Southeast states, or feral hogs, or feral horses/burros. Forcing us to have the uncomfortable decision about feral cats, a relative of the species some have sitting on their couch, can have benefits. It can force us to think about our own biases; force us to think about native species and habitats, even when a species we have as pets is doing significant harm. It forces us to think about the impacts on native non-game species such as songbirds; with native non-game species being a topic I find very important in light of how much habitat is being lost for these native songbird species. We are forced to think about our personal anthropomorphic tendencies for species we have as pets compared to complaints we might make when others do the same with wolves, bears, big predators.
Not saying I have answers, at least not the definitive correct answer, about whether this discussion on shooting feral cats is net benefit or detriment. For now, the discussion is going to stay here, pending some behaviors that cause the thread to be closed or pending some evidence provided in a compelling manner that gets me to reassess how I have weighed the plus/minus of this moderation responsibility.