As busy as it sounded like he was this morning, I hope you didn't tell him I sent you.Just sent out an email, I will post an update on what I hear.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As busy as it sounded like he was this morning, I hope you didn't tell him I sent you.Just sent out an email, I will post an update on what I hear.
Nope, didnt mention ya @Oak. Your in the clearAs busy as it sounded like he was this morning, I hope you didn't tell him I sent you.![]()
I see the logic, but man there are already a ton of organizations out there at the state and national level. My thought is show MWF or BCHA the demand and they will apply focus to draw in more dollars.Thanks for reaching out. So my question is- is there a big enough need/separator to have an Unlimited Chapter? I think the resources would obviously be much more hyper focused on working with state agencies to promote those specific opportunities versus the broad based focus of WSF as a whole in regards to wild sheep.
Yes. A couple of desert units.This would really nice to make a desert sheep opportunity as well. I’m guessing that’s what you are referring to since NR cannot hunt Rocky Mtn Bighorn in Nevada.
Sounds like a natural match to the concept. Would Montana's 48 hours to report work there?I think unit 27-1 would be a great unit for an unlimited tag in Idaho. They give 12 tags in the draw, but there are only 2-3 rams killed every season.
A lot of people fly in to a backcountry strip to start the 27-1 hunt so the ability to check a ram in within 48 hours could be dependent on arranging a flight out.Sounds like a natural match to the concept. Would Montana's 48 hours to report work there?
Politely, still a couple potential problems...there are 8-9+ year old rams in WY that would never be legal under 7/8 including the 9.5 year old ram I killed.Politely, it just sounds like unlimited sheep hunts aren’t for you. And they certainly aren’t for everyone.
Some solutions to the issues you pointed out though:
If we don’t want 4.5 year old rams getting whacked then change it to 7/8 curl instead of 3/4 curl.
Wyoming’s wilderness guide rule is stupid and needs to be eliminated regardless of unlimited sheep hunts.
Don’t hunt 300 or 301 if you want solitude on an unlimited sheep hunt.
I agree that carving out an unlimited area adjacent to the park would be a hard to no sell. What about marginal high elevation, early migration areas in in the winds? Any potential there?I would never advocate for an unlimited hunt in Wyoming for sheep.
I would rather see the current management system stay in place where a sheep hunter that draws doesn't have to fall victim to a short, compressed seasons where people are killing barely legal rams.
I'd much rather see sheep hunters get to enjoy a reasonable season length and be able to look over a lot more rams. That gives hunters the opportunity to select rams over 8 years old, rather than pound on 4-5 year old barely legal sheep. Much better for herd health and much better trophy quality.
One of the best parts of my Wyoming sheep hunt was the ability to spread the season out over a couple months with no pressure to kill the first legal ram I saw. The late part of my hunt was pretty awesome, very few hunters with a tag left and new rams that moved out of the park...rams that would never be hunted in an early unlimited deal. Quality of a sheep hunt matters, and my experience in the MT unlimited units I hunted (2 of them 300 and 301) wasn't near the quality of my WY hunt.
The other issue with an unlimited season in Wyoming is the wilderness guide law...NR's would be forced to use a guide or hunt with a resident which would mean a $10-11K unlimited sheep hunt.
That’s what MT should have in place now in the unlimited sheep units.I guess next time I won’t bother being polite.
7/8 curl, double broomed, or 8 years old then.
That may be a possibility, but IME, the best hunting for sheep would be on the Reservation side of the winds...and I don't think they would be open to the idea at all.I agree that carving out an unlimited area adjacent to the park would be a hard to no sell. What about marginal high elevation, early migration areas in in the winds? Any potential there?