She would never succeed in swinging a hammer... believe me. I just don't agree with this premise, our success is in part hard work but it's also opportunities in various forms.
I mean... trending that way kinda I guess? But ~55% of American's don't have a degree.
First two graphs combined = 55% of electorate Second graph = 45% of electorate
And then there are lots of folks with degrees that work in trades... I mean point being whatever Nancy and Mitch say I need a teacher for my kids, a nurse to take care of me, and truckers to literally make all commerce in my life work so I'm saying I think the distinction is contrived, esp because a nurse and a construction worker have a hell of a lot more in common than a construction worker and and IBanker. It's just trying to split up the working class to F-them in my mind.
View attachment 235756
I agree the the Churchill quote on democracy. Though other democracies have done a better job of handling this allocation of talent issue... IMHO.
Example... UK/Europe.
You go to medschool out of HS, skip the BA/BS. It's 100% free, but when you get done you only 100-150k for primary care MDs, and like 200k for some specialists. This means it's way cheaper and a shorter path for someone to become a MD therefore they demand less pay, therefore it's a lot cheaper to see a MD and therefore way more feasible to have single payer medicine. (also you don't have insurance companies posting record profits and giving shareholders dividends)
They got the "slop" out of the system.
American's can change our systems, saying that people who voted either way among two crappy candidates don't work hard or whatever is stupid.