Cattle for fire suppression

[SAJ-99]

Raking didn’t pan out so Congress is back to work on other ideas.

Grazing away wildfire risk? Congress considers cattle for wildfire suppression

Changes in federal grazing policy would open millions of public land acres to livestock for hazardous fuels management, but critics say claims lack science.

montanafreepress.org

 

[Irrelevant]

cows don't eat cheat grass.

 

[brymoore]

cows don't eat cheat grass.

Chukar do! Chukar release!

 

[Bonasababy]

If you don't like the information real science provides, invent your own.

 

[Irrelevant]

If you don't like the information real science provides, invent your own.

R's are simply looking at the playbook the left has been using for decades. I just read a "report" from 2021 that math is racist.

 

[belshawelk]

I lease my property out for cattle grazing. It makes a big difference in grasses for fire fuel. It has made no difference in elk numbers. Granted I dont have lots of cattle to prevent over grazing.

 

[SAJ-99]

I lease my property out for cattle grazing. It makes a big difference in grasses for fire fuel. It has made no difference in elk numbers. Granted I dont have lots of cattle to prevent over grazing.

I can imagine some instances where it would help and some where it wouldn't. I just think it is obviously an oversimplified solution to a complex problem, which leads me to believe that there is another reason for doing it.

 

[Handlebar]

Cattle can definitely be used in a fuel reduction plan, however it has to be extremely targeted and well managed along with specific inducement to keep the cattle where you want them. Generally speaking it would be a very intense short term burst of grazing, and it is something that would need to be replicated. Cattle will eat cheat grass if it is early enough in the season.

 

[Irrelevant]

Cattle will eat cheat grass if it is early enough in the season.

Interesting. Can they eat it down to the point where it won't put out seed heads?

 

[Handlebar]

Interesting. Can they eat it down to the point where it won't put out seed heads?

That was my point about replicating I should have been clearer. If you have a cheat grass issue, you would need to put cattle into the pasture early for more than one year and you need to remove them in time for the desired species to have a chance, basically you are wearing them out, with good cover native species should be able to out compete cheat grass. I say this with my experience on the Northern mixed grass prairie, Great Basin ecosystems would be I imagine quite different.

 

[Irrelevant]

That was my point about replicating I should have been clearer. If you have a cheat grass issue, you would need to put cattle into the pasture early for more than one year and you need to remove them in time for the desired species to have a chance, basically you are wearing them out, with good cover native species should be able to out compete cheat grass. I say this with my experience on the Northern mixed grass prairie, Great Basin ecosystems would be I imagine quite different.

That's cool. I haven't seen anything except toadflax outcompete it around here, but it could be lack of precision management.

 

[GigiBobert]

In the 1st paragraph it states that 1000 sheep and cattle died in the fire. Are we to assume they were all on public land? I guess if some were on private, then their grazing prescription wasn't effective in stopping the fire?

This entire article is a gross simplification of a complex issue. We have the livestock "brain trusts" of The Public Lands Council (who successfully lobby to keep the federal grazing fee the same as it was in 1978), Montana Stockgrowers and Karen Budd-Falen vs the eco-brain trusts Erik Molvar of Western Watersheds and Andrea Zacarrdi of The Center for Biological Diversity. Throw in a 'heapin helpin of politicos John Barrasso and "my cross is bigger that your cross" Harriet Haggeman and some un-named democrats. Throw in a dash of Wyoming State Forester Kelly Norris who knows who's butt to smooch if he wants to keep his current "position". Ahem. Sounds like a recipe for a giant cluster "F".

Let's have some specific areas and projects proposed, along with funding for fencing and water development, and some actual "vacant" grazing allotments to implement these practices on. And no proposals to beat the shite out of riparian areas while the uplands that are classified as "unsuitable" rangeland due to distance from water, slopes, seasonal closures, distance from viable livestock operations, etc., go un-grazed.

I worked in fire for the USFS for 35 years and have seen fires spot across interstate highways, the Salmon, Colorado and Snake Rivers, 3 miles of goatrock on the Continental Divide, and burn through grazing allotments in drought years that were grazed so short they looked like pool tables. Not to mention clearcuts.

Some grazing systems can lower the intensity of fires burning on the ground. Most federal grazing allotments already have these systems implemented. In drought years, that have become the norm for the last 20, all bets are off!

These people in the article are talking out of their butts!

 

[elkduds]

Cows with rakes