Cattle for fire suppression

[SAJ-99]

Raking didn’t pan out so Congress is back to work on other ideas.

Grazing away wildfire risk? Congress considers cattle for wildfire suppression

Changes in federal grazing policy would open millions of public land acres to livestock for hazardous fuels management, but critics say claims lack science.

montanafreepress.org

 

[Irrelevant]

cows don't eat cheat grass.

 

[brymoore]

cows don't eat cheat grass.

Chukar do! Chukar release!

 

[Bonasababy]

If you don't like the information real science provides, invent your own.

 

[Irrelevant]

If you don't like the information real science provides, invent your own.

R's are simply looking at the playbook the left has been using for decades. I just read a "report" from 2021 that math is racist.

 

[belshawelk]

I lease my property out for cattle grazing. It makes a big difference in grasses for fire fuel. It has made no difference in elk numbers. Granted I dont have lots of cattle to prevent over grazing.

 

[SAJ-99]

I lease my property out for cattle grazing. It makes a big difference in grasses for fire fuel. It has made no difference in elk numbers. Granted I dont have lots of cattle to prevent over grazing.

I can imagine some instances where it would help and some where it wouldn't. I just think it is obviously an oversimplified solution to a complex problem, which leads me to believe that there is another reason for doing it.