Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping System

Bundy next chapter

6speed said:
I was surprised when Big Fin jumped in to support Black Lives Matter but Bundy doing it doesn't surprise me.
Click to expand...

I think Big Fin supported “black lives matter” not Black Lives Matter.
There is a big difference.
One is an idea that every decent person should be on board with.
The other is a bunch of Anti American, commie scum that when they act like the Bundys, should get the same thing Mr Bundy should have gotten - a government bullet to the head or life in solitary.
 
Last edited:
MTGomer said:
I think Big Fin supported “black lives matter” not Black Lives Matter.
There is a big difference.
One is an idea that every decent person should be on board with.
The other is a bunch of Anti American, commie scum that when they act like the Bundys, should get the same thing Mr Bundy should have gotten - a government bullet to the head or life in solitary.
Click to expand...
You know, glad you made the differentiation. No one should support a Marxist takeover, or the destruction of the nuclear family, which has worked so well in certain segments of our society. I'll bet, though, as usual, a tiny fraction of those who support the "capitalized" BLM have any idea what their platform represents were it to be enacted.

And, for either group, I understand your sentiment, but your punisment may be a tad harsh ;)
 
SD_Prairie_Goat said:
I won't pretend to be a lawyer, but after the mistrial why wasn't the prosecution allowed a retrial?

I mean, isn't that the way it normally works?
Click to expand...

If judge believes prosecution behaved too poorly he/she can ban future prosecution for same (or related) charges as punishment to state. Without this option, a state could continue endless prosecution cheating each time daring to be caught. Remember, in many cases the defendants sit in jail through this process so serial prosecution would be the same as a guilty verdict.
 
VikingsGuy said:
If judge believes prosecution behaved too poorly he/she can ban future prosecution for same (or related) charges as punishment to state. Without this option, a state could continue endless prosecution cheating each time daring to be caught. Remember, in many cases the defendants sit in jail through this process so serial prosecution would be the same as a guilty verdict.
Click to expand...
dang, they done f$cked up real good on this one then
 
But I thought that the Freeman of the Land only believe in their "natural law" requiring only that individuals do not harm others, do not damage the property of others, and do not use "fraud or mischief" in their contracts ( the further belief that statute law is a "contract" which they can choose to opt out of at any time)....not so sure the Bundy's qualify under those terms. Have no idea about Admiralty law lol...
 
VikingsGuy said:
If judge believes prosecution behaved too poorly he/she can ban future prosecution for same (or related) charges as punishment to state. Without this option, a state could continue endless prosecution cheating each time daring to be caught. Remember, in many cases the defendants sit in jail through this process so serial prosecution would be the same as a guilty verdict.
Click to expand...
Nice explanation. Thank you. Makes sense.
 
TheDudeAbides said:
A whole cow is around $2,800 to get processed.

What do you think the tag cost is on one these Bundy cattle? ;)

He doesn't even brand his cattle anymore and does not know how many he has. (https://www.motherjones.com/politic...-is-a-free-man-his-cows-are-still-a-nuisance/)

I mean, It would be theft.

However, he hates the police.

So, it is essentially free beef for those that do not have a moral objection to theft.
Click to expand...
Funny,
Edward Abbey contended in Desert Solitaire that's how many herds were started in that part of the world. Cowboys collecting "wild" cows and putting their brand on them.
Is there a statute defining when range cattle become public domain? We hunt Feral Hogs, NZ hunts Feral Cattle. Why not us, too?
 
MarvB said:
But I thought that the Freeman of the Land only believe in their "natural law" requiring only that individuals do not harm others, do not damage the property of others, and do not use "fraud or mischief" in their contracts ( the further belief that statute law is a "contract" which they can choose to opt out of at any time)....not so sure the Bundy's qualify under those terms. Have no idea about Admiralty law lol...
Click to expand...
I was just joking - There's whole mythology about birth certificates, strawman identities, the importance of capitalized names, admiralty law, weird reads on UCC, state citizens, federal citizens, the 14th amendment, etc etc etc. But frankly, some of the crap I read about Bundy's and their supporters justifying their use of the land and non-payment uses the same impeccable logical skils. ;)
 
44hunter45 said:
Funny,
Edward Abbey contended in Desert Solitaire that's how many herds were started in that part of the world. Cowboys collecting "wild" cows and putting their brand on them.
Is there a statute defining when range cattle become public domain? We hunt Feral Hogs, NZ hunts Feral Cattle. Why not us, too?
Click to expand...
If the cattle are not branded, I see no reason why you couldn't claim them.
 
Last edited:
Did I see his picture in the news today, as part of the armed protest at the Idaho state house? Maybe it was just an older photo...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jeremy.b
Family Man's 2024 hunt log
Replies
12
Views
358
duckhunt
duckhunt
Sytes
"English" bird names, "Offensive or Exclusionary" to change.
2 3 4
Replies
74
Views
3K
Sytes
Sytes
TOGIE
Went to Wisconsin
2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
5K
Wind Gypsy
W
B
AZ deer 2023
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
PorterHouse
PorterHouse
P
USFS grazing and timber
Replies
8
Views
927
Straight Arrow
Straight Arrow

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
111,246
Messages
1,952,275
Members
35,098
Latest member
Trapper330

Share this page

Back
Top