Antler Point Restrictions

[nrpate05]

I want to get an idea of how Hunttalk folks feel about antler point restrictions. The WY G&F commission voted yesterday to retain antler point restrictions in the Wyoming Range and Jackson area that were implemented after the 22/23 winter. The G&F Dept. recommended removing them in those areas.

My understanding is that these really only work for a couple of years and that they can impact trophy quality in the long run because you harvest a lot of 2.5 yr old 4 points that would be giants with a few more years, but you don't kill the 3.5 yr old 3 point that likely wouldn't get huge.

https://www.jhnewsandguide.com/news...cle_7f1e6b2b-bfe6-4fe6-862f-488a19b71bad.html

Curious of any opinions on the issue.

 

[fowladdict]

IMHO trophy quality is down in the areas that Idaho has implemented long term antler restrictions. I'm sure other reasons factor in as well.

 

[Elkmagnet]

My understanding is that these really only work for a couple of years and that they can impact trophy quality in the long run because you harvest a lot of 2.5 yr old 4 points that would be giants with a few more years, but you don't kill the 3.5 yr old 3 point that likely wouldn't get huge.

I agree with this.
I listened to a podcast where a biologist laid out a good case for point restrictions as a short term tool but said the studies show diminishing returns after a few years.
Also you are forcing every meat or casual hunter to spend more time looking for a big deer.

 

[cgasner1]

I like the restrictions in over objective areas where they have implemented 5 point or less for elk. It lets them take elk off the landscape and protect the mature animals

 

[FairWeather]

Genuinely curious: Why should trophy quality be of any concern to the F&G dept. if their goal is managing for heard health & stability?

 

[rookieforever33]

Seeing all the spikes killed on day one of the season tells me some good genetics get taken out before they have a chance to show. If they have a point restriction to help herd health I am for it. If the restrictions are for trophy quality I dont think they will work.

 

[cgasner1]

Genuinely curious: Why should trophy quality be of any concern to the F&G dept. if their goal is managing for heard health & stability?

75 dollar pp and 2000 dollar tag

 

[sclancy27]

Genuinely curious: Why should trophy quality be of any concern to the F&G dept. if their goal is managing for heard health & stability?

They manage for the public trust, which partly means not decimate populations and partly means managing for social pressures. Anymore, I think most bios would agree that the social part is the overwhelming majority of their jobs.

 

[Gerald Martin]

What good is a Hunttalk thread without a tangential hijack?
In regards to antler point restrictions for deer, I don’t think they work to raise the overall age class since many bucks that would meet the antler restriction requirements can do so at a young age. And many that don’t meet antler restrictions at 2 1/2 years old may never meet them.


However, I do think antler point restrictions for bull elk do work to increase age class due to the way elk antlers develop and the high probability of bulls to develop at least one 6 point antler by 4 1/2 years old

 

[Elkmagnet]

Seeing all the spikes killed on day one of the season tells me some good genetics get taken out before they have a chance to show. If they have a point restriction to help herd health I am for it. If the restrictions are for trophy quality I dont think they will work.

This brings up a thought.
Do people lump spike only elk seasons/ 2pt only deer season as a "point restriction" hunt.
I do and am generally opposed to them from a biological standpoint unless it is designed to add youth opportunities.