Khunter
Well-known member
I was surprised how well chatGPT carved up multiple years of CPW recap reports to answer my questions and suggest which hunt I had better chance to draw that included multi year “trend” . Mine is a paid version, not free.I was extremely disappointed with ChatGPT when I tried to use it for researching where to apply for tags this year, it gave me a lot of completely wrong information.
As of now, GoHunt is still worth the $99 or whatever over the free chatbots as far as I can tell.
Edited to add: I won three decent public land tag draw this year, all the 3 tags I picked based off odds I found on GoHunt.
If I hadn't used GoHunt and instead just relied on the free chatbots, I may have gotten nothing in the draws.
I also used Chatgpt to generate illustrations and help draft text for a 12 page fable I distributed at a symposium i plan for 340 folks each year. Just a fun no risk project to add a little levity that was well received. Loosely framed on goldilocks and the three bears concepts.
This fun project also served as a great learning experience for how to effectively harness AI via clear constraints and instructions so it does not go rogue and waste your time with useless iterations.


One place AI works well for my work is distilling and organizing key passages of BLM resource management plans, EAs, and EIS. Those can be massive docs. To aid framing up issues of concern or support for my agency to provide comments on. Requires careful checking to ensure things are not missed of course. But definite time saver to find and extract certain relevant passages including page citations for each.
Another is state oil and gas rulemakings. Feed AI two dozen prehearing position statments from other parties and set it to the task of identifying parties who align or do not align with our positions and it does well to carve through all of that and make a nice table outlining all of it. Not ever perfect but big time saver.
In short, feeding AI a mountain of text with clear instruction of what to look for and how to organize results can be very effective. Over reliance on said result without due diligence would be a recipe for failure and embarrassment in public proceedings. Have seen some doozies where a party clearly used AI as their ‘brain’ instead of using own and it showed.

