Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Imo To me it seems logical to - Buy land, remove public access, sell the exclusiveness.I truly wonder what the Wilks end game is. They were the major backers/push for the new trespass law in Idaho this year, while at the same time having a pile of the land they own for sale after owning it for just a couple years.
Good on the groups that chased this down.
I truly wonder what the Wilks end game is. They were the major backers/push for the new trespass law in Idaho this year, while at the same time having a pile of the land they own for sale after owning it for just a couple years.
It's such a weird and obscure mindset to lust over money and power. I've never understood that and not sure I ever will.
After the bills are paid and some is put into the personal savings and some into the retirement account for the month, I feel content. Maybe that's why I'll never be a millionaire!
I agree. It seems this thread is erroneously titled. As is the case time after time in Montana, the ultra wealthy who put up the gates continue to win at least temporarily, if not into the distant future, and prevent the public from accessing public lands. Even if the legality is in favor of the public, it takes years, sometimes decades, before it's settled and the public gets the access to public lands blocked off.Did they lose? Sounds to me like it's still gated and nothing is going to be done until a law can be changed. Sounds to me like they are winning until that happens.