Dan O
Well-known member
That depends on which fairway it lands inGolf is to easy now that people can hit the ball 300 yards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That depends on which fairway it lands inGolf is to easy now that people can hit the ball 300 yards.
The key is to read the wind and make an end run to insert a zinger to harvest a few easy likes to up your reaction score.I definitely wish they would go away, I think they help accelerate threads off the rails.
Personally, I love a good debate, I feel like occasionally I will spar with someone make a comment and get a bunch of “likes” and that person feels like the entire forum is against them. Pretty much destroys any chance for dialogue as understandably that individual gets defensive. Been on the reverse end as well, doesn’t feel great.
Interesting take, Thinking that Mr. Wensel didn't understand that things change. That is what the entire article is about. How much hunting has changed. What he is lamenting isn't so much the change but the fact that when things change something gets lost in that change. What he feels is being lost is what he, and I, feel are some of the most important aspects of the experience of hunting. The development of the hunting skills that allow you to have an up close and personal relationship with your prey. Then using those skills to kill an animal with minimal aid of technology. That's a damn fine feeling. I don't see where he blames young people for anything. Old farts use compound bows, inline muzzleloaders and magnum rifles topped with scopes that do everything but grill the backstrap for you, just as much as young folk do. Personally I think things are slowly trending back to " the good old ways" Long bows and recurves are becoming all the rage. Many are starting to realize that a sidelock is ten times more fun to shoot than a scope mounted inline. It wouldn't even surprise me if people started to realize that a lever action .30-30 with open sights is a damn fine way to fill the freezer.Seems more like a boomer rant that goes all over the place than an actual article but I’m a millennial so I’m sure the writer doesn’t care what I think. Just curious though. Wouldn’t it have been easy for people a generation or two before this guy to write a gripe page about back in the good old days when real hunters used guns that only held one bullet at a time? Things change Mr. Wensel. It’s almost comical that people get to be near 70 years old and can’t figure out things don’t stay the same but they call my generation stupid.![]()
Lots of different people in our community. 7 years ago one group dominated hunting media.Interesting take, Thinking that Mr. Wensel didn't understand that things change. That is what the entire article is about. How much hunting has changed. What he is lamenting isn't so much the change but the fact that when things change something gets lost in that change. What he feels is being lost is what he, and I, feel are some of the most important aspects of the experience of hunting. The development of the hunting skills that allow you to have an up close and personal relationship with your prey. Then using those skills to kill an animal with minimal aid of technology. That's a damn fine feeling. I don't see where he blames young people for anything. Old farts use compound bows, inline muzzleloaders and magnum rifles topped with scopes that do everything but grill the backstrap for you, just as much as young folk do. Personally I think things are slowly trending back to " the good old ways" Long bows and recurves are becoming all the rage. Many are starting to realize that a sidelock is ten times more fun to shoot than a scope mounted inline. It wouldn't even surprise me if people started to realize that a lever action .30-30 with open sights is a damn fine way to fill the freezer.

Super hardcore dehydrated beer.Oh my. My logical mind has so many questions about that pic. What goes down must come up. Unless, of course he is walking out the bottom. In that case, why didn't he walk up? Oh, I know. The heli dropped him off at the top.
I wonder what kind of beer he drinks?
gouch
I sure hope you are right. But it has been a long time since a young stud in his 20's, 30's or even 60's has made a pass at me. But, Hope springs eternal !
geetar
if we are going to base our responses and his article on the names given each generation, please ask Randy to delete my post's on page 4 ( 62 AND 72 ), since I represent the "silent" generation--my bad.
I understand what you’re saying. Maybe I would have been better off wording it that Mr. Wensel seems surprised and frustrated that things change instead of not realizing it and after 70 years I would have thought he would have come to expect it. I’m not into the long range shooting craze myself. In fact I usually shoot an 06 with a 4x scope and I’ve sold my compound bow to get into traditional archery so I totally get wanting to keep the old ways around. It’s just a bore to listen to a guy act like all the good days are behind us in an article that rambles all over the place. We definitely lose something each time something changes but there are things to be gained each time something changes. Just depends on how you look at it.Interesting take, Thinking that Mr. Wensel didn't understand that things change. That is what the entire article is about. How much hunting has changed. What he is lamenting isn't so much the change but the fact that when things change something gets lost in that change. What he feels is being lost is what he, and I, feel are some of the most important aspects of the experience of hunting. The development of the hunting skills that allow you to have an up close and personal relationship with your prey. Then using those skills to kill an animal with minimal aid of technology. That's a damn fine feeling. I don't see where he blames young people for anything. Old farts use compound bows, inline muzzleloaders and magnum rifles topped with scopes that do everything but grill the backstrap for you, just as much as young folk do. Personally I think things are slowly trending back to " the good old ways" Long bows and recurves are becoming all the rage. Many are starting to realize that a sidelock is ten times more fun to shoot than a scope mounted inline. It wouldn't even surprise me if people started to realize that a lever action .30-30 with open sights is a damn fine way to fill the freezer.
Longing for the good old days only makes sense if the good old days were taken away by means beyond you control. I started hunting with a recurve bow in 1966. I killed my first deer in 1968 with that recurve. Just this year I upgraded to a long bow. So not much has changed for me in the last 54 years. The fact that other people are killing animals at 600 yards with high tech equipment doesn't effect my hunting at all. The only things I really miss about the good old days are that there were more critters so it was easier to get one, there were a lot less people out there during archery season so it was more peaceful and my knees didn't hurt. Mostly it's the knees.
The bolded part, yes it does, it affects us all.
There is absolutely no debate about it that the ability to kill animals more efficiently at long range, better glass, GPS technology, google earth, trail cams, better clothing, better optics, ATV's, UTV's, ebikes, it all impacts the resource.
The more efficient we become, it impacts herd dynamics, bull to cow/buck to doe ratio's, impacts trophy quality, and total populations.
The only way that the GF agencies have to really compensate for the efficiency of the modern hunter is to:
1. Limit technology which is hard to legislate and unpopular because companies like to sell products that many think they "need" to be successful. Follow the money. Its also tough to put the technology genie back in the bottle.
2. Limit permits as more efficiency means more animals die.
3. Limit season length.
After seeing the BS that goes on with sheep hunting in Wyoming first hand (as well as elk and deer), there is NO question in my mind that technology is severely limiting over-all opportunity and over-all quality.
The only real question is how much opportunity we are all willing to sacrifice for the sake of technology making it easier to find success.
But, make no mistake about it, technology is impacting our wildlife and hunting opportunities. That really sucks for the guys that value season length and opportunity over efficiency.