There is truth to the republican v democrat.
One party is clearly opposed to firearms and one is supportive of.
@VikingsGuy , that sounds great and from a hunting conservation pov, I'd side 65/35 Democrat.
There's a reason for that as well... Democrats tend to be more supportive of "conservation". Sure, sounds good and fancy cheer talk for fellow Democrat HT members to feel appreciated though that is not the truth of specifically OREGON legislation.
However, to the point of Oregon Liberal agenda... Aside from those
@FI460 and other D/R/I/other party who knows a bit more detail and speak with others
are the minority.
From Oregon Democrat majority vs Republican, there is a divided line for firearms. Oregon is pretty flipping fugged.
As a Montanan (registered Independent), I vote Tester, voted Cooney, voted for the fugged up puppet singer Quist, Schweitzer x's 2, Bullock, on and on... Tester is a value that Democrats know to hold a seat, they let him support 2A. I lean R for my independent side and Daines is one I vote for consistently as he's involved in issues beyond Montana, as is Tester.
Anyhow, some here get in a tissy when the D word is brought up... Fact is D
majority oppose firearms, R supports firearms. Oregon is strictly opposed to firearms. Are there minority D's who support firearms that lean on the R side, not extreme R side.
My two coppers.