Proposal to ban fur sales in Colorado

Pelican

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 24, 2018
Messages
490
Location
Fruita, Colorado
Thank you for posting - I submitted my comments a few days ago.

This is one more wicked reminder that when you vote this fall - you will hopefully vote for the candidate that best aligns with your outdoor lifestyle regardless of their party affiliation.

The furbearer issue wouldn't even be up for vote if Polis wasn't exercising his anti hunting and fishing agenda!
 
Thank you for posting - I submitted my comments a few days ago.

This is one more wicked reminder that when you vote this fall - you will hopefully vote for the candidate that best aligns with your outdoor lifestyle regardless of their party affiliation.

The furbearer issue wouldn't even be up for vote if Polis wasn't exercising his anti hunting and fishing agenda!
Facts^^^
 
I think they should be required to take a couple laws off the book for every new one they create.
 
Colorado has spent tens of millions making Carbon County Wyoming a better place to hunt. They even sponsored wolf hunts for us!
 
I'm glad to hear it failed. Hopefully every Sportsman in Colorado writes in questioning the bag limit and their lack of comment.

I feel for those of you in Colorado dealing with this and other issues.
 
Otero was the swing. Voted for the 2 bag limit but against the sale ban. He needs to hear from folks on what a bad vote that was, especially since it was never presented as an alternative to the public AND there were other alternatives that had been presented which were clearly compromise efforts.
 
I was definitely surprised that Otero (our sportsman’s representative) voted on the 2 bag limit for furbearers which ended up being the deciding vote. Normally he doesn’t do or say anything of value, but historically he had still voted on the side of sportsmen. Staff recommendation was to keep the bag limit at unlimited.

However, I will add that because the the 2 bag limit had just been passed, some of the commission seemed satisfied that there wouldn’t be possible over-harvesting. Dumb argument, but that in combination with the law enforcement issues seemed to persuade some. Both votes were 6-5, so only one vote difference was the swing. There was really no good argument on the pro-fur ban side, they kept going back and forth how they were still “concerned”, but 5 of them still voted to pursue the ban (which is scary). In my opinion, bag limit change was just enough to deny the commercial for ban.

Overall, seems like a good outcome for us as the bag limits seem like something that can be adjusted relatively easily down the road, while the commercial fur ban would be a little more complex.
 
Back
Top