James Riley
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 1,820
As a Recon Team Leader in the Marine Corps I went to the FBI Academy back in 78 as part of a Quick Reaction Crisis Mission Course (anti-counter-terrorism, hostage rescue, direct action). We studied "terrorism" then and it seems not much has changed. The link above says "There is no single, universally accepted, definition of terrorism." The "experts" struggled with it back then and they struggle with it today. It's hard to define it while, at the same time, exempting the U.S. from being a State Sponsor.
Nevertheless, I have to wonder who got the word "property" tossed into the C.F.R. definition: "Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as 'the unlawful use of force and violence against . . . property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives'” [Emphasis mine.]
So, terror includes violence against property. Anyone who feels a sense of terror when an empty building gets spray painted doesn't know what terror is. What was that distopian novel where the government gave an opposite meaning to words? It's like WMDs including assault rifles.
I suspect private for profit industry sought to have property included so we could go to war with hippies that trashed their buildings. Let's call out Dev Gru and kill those bastards at three in the morning, or water board them after taking them off to Gitmo. Maybe a little drone action. You know, because the board of directors a thousand miles away on the golf course felt "terrorized" by a burnt bull dozier.
Nevertheless, I have to wonder who got the word "property" tossed into the C.F.R. definition: "Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as 'the unlawful use of force and violence against . . . property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives'” [Emphasis mine.]
So, terror includes violence against property. Anyone who feels a sense of terror when an empty building gets spray painted doesn't know what terror is. What was that distopian novel where the government gave an opposite meaning to words? It's like WMDs including assault rifles.
I suspect private for profit industry sought to have property included so we could go to war with hippies that trashed their buildings. Let's call out Dev Gru and kill those bastards at three in the morning, or water board them after taking them off to Gitmo. Maybe a little drone action. You know, because the board of directors a thousand miles away on the golf course felt "terrorized" by a burnt bull dozier.
Last edited:
