OR ballot to end hunting, fishing, ranching, dairy farming. . .

Your quote doesn't show it, but everything in italics is set to be struck from current law.

Bold is an addition, italics is removal, so essentially everything in the above quote will be removed from exemption.

It's a weird convention for ballot petitions.

Thank you for the clarification, that makes more sense. I guess it sounded too fantastical that a group would try to pass this, so in an attempt to be more informed, I became less iformed. Commence the opposition!

I'm used to the strike-through method. I thought the italics were strange and some weird point of emphasis.
 
The eastern 2/3 of Oregon might just use this as more traction to split the state
While I would love this it’s impossible. All 50 states have to approve a state moving boundary plus the house and senate. Other blue states would never let it happen.
 
I'm not surprised that all of the diehard democrats on here have somehow missed this thread.

I hope the voters in Oregon are able to kill this.
 
Ballot initiatives like IP 28 in OR and 302-Right to Hunt/Fish in CO are too important to devolve into partisan bickering.

You win through addition, not subtraction.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
119,224
Messages
2,220,516
Members
38,821
Latest member
KS_Flatlander
Back
Top