Let us know what you think about 9mm after reading this:
https://www.americanhunter.org/articles/2016/8/10/alaska-outfitter-defends-fishermen-from-raging-grizzly-with-9mm-pistol/?utm_campaign=meetedgar&utm_medium=social&utm_source=meetedgar.com#.V6uFoJylXX0.facebook
www.hunttalk.com
I saw that article when it first came out. It looked to me, from the article that the bear was facing, menacing his clients and not attacking him, so he had the benefit of
a broadside shot that wasn't moving real fast. He also had a semi-auto rather then revolver to get off a lot of rounds.
I would rather have a 9mm then a .22.
Bigger is better in my world.
a lot of attacks the victims mention that it happened so fast, they hardly had time to react.
If I have only a chance for 1 shot, I'd like to make it a big one.
I carry a big heavy .44 mag. It's a pain a lot fo the time, especially after a 10- 15 mile day and doesn' ride real well on my hip.
I have been considering a semi (10mm) in leu of a six shooter. especially after my revolver froze up on me opening week in the snow.
I do check it a couple x per day when out. The front chest rig that JLS suggested to me and is shown in a pic earlier on the thread looks appealing
from a comfort and access point of view.
To your question:
In the end I think caliber doesn't matter quite as much your ability to quickly unholster the gun and attain the target. I wouldn't want
to get hit with any of them.
During summer and early fall scouting I practice drawing and attaining the (practice) target through the sights (w/ the gun unloaded).
Muscle memory.
Some are happy w/ bear spray. It's all good. I think bear spray is wonderfully effective in a lot of circumstances and you both get the chance
to walk away. But if only 1 of us gets to walk away it had better be me. I leave the spray behind later in the season when the weather get cold.