[This turned into something way longer and more 'Um, OK" than what I was actually thinking...]
The Chinese Wall is being looked at as well.
"The organization describes itself as "five friends" who grew up in Montana ..."
5 people is now a movement.
I'm not trying to be snarky here. (Well, some say that's all I've got.) But this one just seems to be the silliest of all to me. Some possible new names could be Ted Turner Escarpment? Jane Fonda Uplift? Sara & Sam Scwherin Overlook? Harrison Ford Fold?
If, as the First People's say, their ancestors speak to them in these places, we should accept their names for them. But then we should never utter those names without their blessing. What then do we call them?
I definitely see what NHY is saying about the steady drip. But I think if we get outraged one way or the other, we are just feeding the trolls.
Offense as a movement is an entirely human activity. If you offend a bison he will simply give you a hook and a toss. The rocks do not care any more than the Pikeminnows were hurt to be called Squawfish. A google search of places no longer having "squaw" in the name shows many of them are now named after white european men. I'm not sure that is culturally sensitive progress, either.
If Mike Lee would vow to protect public lands on pain of death from this day forward, I'd name my next son after him. (Although at momma's age, "Isaac" would be a better fit.)
To paraphrase my tag line, anyone who ever had anything named after them was likely all too human. Today's heroes become tomorrow's enemies.