Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
email sentJust got confirmation from members of the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee that indeed, the Parliamentarian did rule that Lee's provisions to sell lands are considered in violation of the Byrd Rule.
So, that effectively kills the existing language. There are three other options Lee has:
1. Convince VP Vance, as presiding officer of the Senate, to overrule the Parliamentarian.
2. Convince Senator Thune, as Senate Majority Leader, to overrule the Parliamentarian (most likely route Lee will take).
3. Lee introduces new language that would require the Parliamentarian to rule again on his new language (but he is running out of time if they want to get a second ruling from the Parliamentarian.
So, the call to action this morning is this - Contact Senator Thune's office and ask him to respect the decision of the Parliamentarian and keep Senator Lee's land sale language out of the bill.
Senator John Thune
United States Senate SD-511
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-2321
Email link - https://www.thune.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact
You know what is funny about this is that it is a liberal (leftist) viewpoint for the government to step in and spend or come out with programs to help with providing lower class housing. Who is duping who?Mike is out here calling you all leftists again today:
View attachment 375956
Charlie Kirk shoots a 6Creed.If you need a limp pizzle like Charlie Kirk to help you, you may want to rethink your approach.
I would have thought the drubbing Jason Chaffetz took left a clear enough message. I will live long enough to see Senator Lee another has been commentator on Fox News.Agreed, this needs to be universally recognized as a political third rail.
I doubt Charlie shoots anything but his mouth off honestlyCharlie Kirk shoots a 6Creed.
"According to Lee's post, the updated draft of the bill will only include BLM land that is within five miles of cities."
These properties, the ones within city limits, are probably the most used by a variety of people. One of the last pieces to ever consider disposing. Open space around dense living areas provide an important recreational resource to so many.
Lee, you really have no clue how your constituents spend their free time. Most of us don't go to our private course after work.
Mike is out here calling you all leftists again today:
View attachment 375956
I broke down and actually set up an account on X to see that post and associated comments. I lasted two minutes. X is a dumpster fire. I'm out. I think I will just continue to rely on the X reposts here.If you have to use Charlie Kirk to defend your stance, you've already lost the debate.
I had never heard of this group before. But I did some looking and it appears they are out of KS not UT? And one of their core values is that:This group is his only option; a group from Utah.
Exactly what I said to Thune today in my e-mail:Though the threat isn't over yet, it's hard not to just step back and marvel at the response. Of course folks quibble about the nuances of management, and those matter, but I can't think of any issue about which the American Public is more unified than the existence of Public Lands.
Pretty cool.
Without saying too much, this group is a sham and the guy in that video is a complete clown that I am very familiar with. I’ll let you do your own research. He will certainly take credit for the whole thing I’m sure. He’s very good at that.This is what hunter nation is saying now! "It's great news that the sale of public land is going to be COMPLETELY removed from the BBB"
So was the X post Lee posted that he heard Hunter Nation that they (Hunter Nation) told him how much they opposed it and that was the straw that broke this camels back?