I don't (not being a MT res) have as big a dog in this fight as the rest of you but what really galls me is when politicians step over the top of game management. The numbers need to be reduce, a plan is devised to "begin" reduction (and perhaps gain a bit of revenue from it...not a bad thing IMHO), and then some chicken shit politico sudeenly know more than the professional employees being paid to make such decisons?
I don't care if its a bad PR problem, animals "rights" problem, or what...the biologists that supposedly know whats best for the herd, habitat, carrying capacity, whatever...saying that the numbers need to be reduced and that plan should be carried out!
We get the same crap EVERY year here in this foresaken state. Fish and Game will propose to add some anterless deer hunts to get the buck/doe ratios back into shape and change the overall herd numbers and dynamics. They will do heli counts, range reviews (always fun running plot points...ugh), etc., and then model the whole fuggin enchilada to get a target objective for the hunt. Then at the very last minute BAR NONE, the hunt will be cancelled because the "County Board of Supervisors" thinks that there might be a public outcry for shooting "girl deer"??????
So how much money is spent on this kind of "game management" and who ultimately benefits? Its not the herd, its not the range/habitat, its not the hunters...oh, yeah- its the "politically correct" members of the politico. And before anyone spouts off with the "you elected these folks" rhetoric- hunters will always be in the voting minority in this state even when the Fish & Game themselves (can anyone say Mt. Lion) is siding with the hunting populous.
I surrender my soapbox.........