I know you all have worked really hard on this.
By this point it seems so watered down it looks hardly any different from the status quo, and the value of pushing forward seems questionable. If there are any significant differences from what is already in place, they are not obvious.
Who is your intended audience for the graphs and many paragraphs of intent and justification? I canāt imagine your average hunter will see a clear, obvious, and straightforward what and why for the proposal. I wonder how well-versed the persons in authority are about all the gritty details and nuance to understand how this works as a whole to improve things.
You all started out bold and big, and it was an exciting proposal. Over time and a lot of engagement with folks not on the forum we became aware of how deeply entrenched opposition is from so many corners, and how starkly unrealistic some very logical and reasonable changes were.
At the end of the day I sincerely hope this is a step in the right direction, or at very least the beginning of a shift away from the decades-long decline in quality elk and deer hunting opportunities on MT public land.