D
Deleted member 16864
Guest
Do they have nice boobs then?
Landlocked State Trust Lands
- Thread starter Ben Lamb
- Start date
D
Deleted member 16864
Guest
Well, cowgirls if I had my choice. Ain’t Christmas but I already know I’m getting coal so what the heck.
D
Deleted member 16864
Guest
Attachments
Rack Daniels
Well-known member
Let’s go! I know a few good spots!If someone corner crosses (legit) and gets charged in MT - I will happily donate 100 dollars to their legal case.
Hope the AG reads this
Rack Daniels
Well-known member
YOURE DAMN RIGHT IT DOES
cgasner1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2016
- Messages
- 5,303
Meh I doubt it would make that many more it would just spread them out farther. Most people won’t hike to the corner as it is now
Eric Albus
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,810
More gut piles = less quality
Forkyfinder
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
- Messages
- 5,625
At some point someone needs to regulate opportunity. Either way. Every year people shoot further.
Rack Daniels
Well-known member
Only guys that get paid or pay for quality worry enough that they’d give it up entirely for better “quality”.
If i doubled my gut piles every year on public without having to pay a guide or outfitter, I’d say the quality has INCREASED.
I know many of you old farts that aren’t outfitters will disagree because you want your BIGGGGG MULE deer back, but I’ll really have a hard time believing you don’t pay for your access or your big bucks. A public land hunter would see more gut piles- more accessible lands, AS AN INCREASE in quality
Eric Albus
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,810
For a lot of us success is defined by taking a mature animal.
If accessible lands held quantity and quality we’d not have an issue.
If accessible lands held quantity and quality we’d not have an issue.
Eric Albus
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,810
I don’t know how we close Pandora’s box
I have nothing against long range shooting….at steel targets.
However I can’t legislate ethics or morals.
Forkyfinder
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
- Messages
- 5,625
You can legislate tag quantities, season structures, and NR tags.
antlerradar
Well-known member
I can kind of get on board with the NR tags. Legislators should keep there sticky fingers off of the other two and plenty of other wildlife related items.
grizzly63
Well-known member
Do what Aldo says and regulate commercial hunting, or outright ban it.
Eric Albus
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,810
Commercial hunting was outlawed before any of us were born.
Eric Albus
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,810
Tag quantities yes, season structure is up to the commission.
Eric Albus
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,810
We’re I king, mule deer would be a separate license, NR put on regional cap, drastically reduced. Season would end Nov 5.
Until I’m anointed I have to tolerate what we have to deal with.
Good thing about this forum, it’s taught me a lot about suffering other people’s uneducated opinions, about myself and industry.
Until I’m anointed I have to tolerate what we have to deal with.
Good thing about this forum, it’s taught me a lot about suffering other people’s uneducated opinions, about myself and industry.
Forkyfinder
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
- Messages
- 5,625
Well Eric,
Recent survey (thanks to the montana hunters first act) should give you plenty of data to be "king" and head to helena next session and get something done.
Going from below 20k nr tags to 70k nr tags (while r is relatively flat) is a problem that you and every other legislator can solve. Im certain you'll have plenty of residents who say they are tired of the state being over ran with people who dont live here. My personal opinion - itd do way more than changing season dates.
If youre worried about gut piles - id start there - considering most NR DIY guys arent willing to leave empty handed.
