BigHornRam
Well-known member
Wartsila sounds like a lot of hype with few details. Time will tell if they can perform or are just another green snake oil company.
Land requirements for renewable energy
- Thread starter Wildabeest
- Start date
SAJ-99
Well-known member
We already know your views on Tesla but they sold Texas some too. The battery itself isn’t “snake oil”. It’s a battery.
BigHornRam
Well-known member
It's not a battery. It's the "next generation storage system".
Wärtsilä Energy Storage - GridSolv Quantum
Wärtsilä’s GridSolv Quantum is a fully integrated energy storage system optimised for flexibility, functionality and safety.
storage.wartsila.com
I share you frustrations. Identifying problems and trying to find solutions in our current political climate results in a laundry list of 'whataboutisms' or other problems we need to address first, as if we are incapable of working on multiple problems at the same time
The world is littered with the corpses of those who found every excuse to do nothing. Those who ignore those voices & move forward are the ones statues get made of, then torn down because you probably said something stupid at one time, and now someone is mad at your statue.
BigHornRam
Well-known member
VikingsGuy
Well-known member
As I read this, we can have all the energy we need by building all this crap in only Iowa and Missouri -- if this is true I vote yesInteresting article with enough cool charts, maps and graphs to impress even @wllm1313!
U.S. Needs A Lot More Land to Go Green by 2050
We may need 250 million acres for wind farms alone.www.bloomberg.com
(ps - the current rush to solar and wind will be regretted just like when the pundits told us hydrogenated vegetable oils were the healthy alternative and EtOH was good for the environment. If you do the math, next gen nuclear feeding a "hydrogen economy" is the only real answer, but none of this is about science, it is about political virtue signalling.)
BigHornRam
Well-known member
Buzz word for the day. "Mineral security"
www.cnbc.com
Electric vehicles and renewables will need a dramatic rise in mineral supply, IEA warns
With demand only set to increase, there will be a number of hurdles to overcome.
JustinsDad
Well-known member
Decimating and sterilizing millions of wild desert wild land is not good for wildlife. And there is wildlife there. At least for now. However, the politicians DGAF if it’s bad for the wildlife or environment. As long as it hurts the oil companies, their sponsors like Bloomberg and Soros are happy so onward they forge. The millions of sheep who follow them are clueless as to what they’re really supporting.
antlerradar
Well-known member
I have electric motors that use 80 dollars worth of electricity in less than a day.
MarvB
Well-known member
Double negative? Double positive?
Opposite poles of electrical theory?
Opposite poles of electrical theory?
Hydrophilic
Well-known member
First name Ima, last name Hogg?
BigHornRam
Well-known member
If she was from California it would cost you $80 for 5 minutes.
VikingsGuy
Well-known member
"dated a gal" or "inflated a gal"?
Hydrophilic
Well-known member
ouch!
CoffeeGoat
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2020
- Messages
- 137
One of the general rules of the electrical grid is the order of priorities - reliability, cost, efficiency. If you start screwing with the order, things get squirrely really fast.
@Wind Gypsy is spot on here - electricity is generated somewhere on the grid the instant you use it. The amount of storage we have on the grid is currently vanishingly small, and while a bit more is probably a good idea, it's nowhere near feasible to provide substantial backup. Both from an economic perspective - and a technical perspective, it's a huge amount of batteries. Secondly any of these small electrical generators will discover - they serve at the "pleasure of the King," they'll either take the deal the grid offers, or they won't run. Residential solar generators are generally installed on the basis of "net metering" where you run the meter backwards and forward depending on which way the electricity is going - but this is fundamentally predicated on the idea that the grid is a free service/storage system for you. Eventually as the number of residential installs increased the grid operators, who have to pay to maintain the grid, have decided they weren't going to do that anymore - and they changed the deal. This happens to everyone, even GW generators, and that means energy costs more.
This has classically been a fundamental problem of "advances in energy" - they only really pencil out as economical when the price of energy is absurdly high. California provides a good example of screwing with the power supply priorities, once you start saying we're prioritizing efficiency (or low carbon, or magic pixie fairy dust) the cost goes up, and push on it enough and the reliability suffers. Rolling blackouts in California are common, not because of renewables per-se, but by prioritizing renewables to the level that it makes it uneconomical to run other power generation, and making permitting for new transmission lines impossible to get - means you're going to have reliability problems. They try lots of "economic incentives" to solve the problem, and while they help, they artificially distort the actual market, which causes long term problems. A good example is the "Energiewende" where Germany decided they were going to go really green, and then energy got way more expensive, and while they installed a ton of wind/solar, because they made it uneconomic to run clean things (like nukes) they ended up with higher carbon emissions because they ended up needing to run some really awful coal plants to balance the whole thing.
You will absolutely hear more about this - it's only spooling up now but it's going to get nasty. Historically, wars get fought over energy and vital materials, it's only a matter of time. Right now, we're just propping up warlord dictators and child slaves, it's not pretty - but it'll get worse.Buzz word for the day. "Mineral security"
Electric vehicles and renewables will need a dramatic rise in mineral supply, IEA warns
With demand only set to increase, there will be a number of hurdles to overcome.
silasd
Active member
This pretty much wins it for me. Epic.
Wildabeest
Well-known member
The Koch brothers aren’t exactly friends of the environment either. Not everything has to be partisan.
antlerradar
Well-known member
Nothing wrong if they are short, fat and need a lot of juice because they purr like a kitten
SAJ-99
Well-known member
Lots of good points in your post. What you cited mostly doesn’t work because of the high regulation embedded in the utilities markets. Put politicians in charge of anything and it goes to crap because they need to please voters while somehow lining their own pockets too. If you want capitalism and the free market to work, take the chains off. But you won’t like the result. Look at what Enron did during the dereg era. Electricity need to cost enough so people conserve it. Air conditioning would be a luxury, not the god-given right people view it as now and require running the thermostat at 80 during the summer, not 65. Same goes for water. It is hard to determine what the future 50yrs will hold for utilities but I guarantee it won’t look like it does today.
Similar threads
