I apply in Arizona, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Montana, and Nevada every year and either apply for an actual hunt or just for points. I also have applied and drawn in New Mexico but I obviously cannot earn points there. After four years, over 30 applications a year (not counting my two boys), I have to ask "Is it worth it? I may get tags but boy do I have to earn them.
I have grown to hate Colorado as only the max point holders will get the primo tags. Utah has ten billion people with points as it has been so cheap to apply, Wyoming has an intriguing system which I currently like as I just drew an archery elk tag (wont be back anytime soon after 2010), Arizona is tough etc, etc, etc.
Wouldn't it just be easier to use the New Mexico system and pay upfront for the tag and apply? The odds in NM are better than many states and you can purchase a landowner tag if you are unsuccessful in the draw. NM holds tags the majority of the tags for the state residents. Simplicity seems to have its advantages.
What do you guys think?
I have grown to hate Colorado as only the max point holders will get the primo tags. Utah has ten billion people with points as it has been so cheap to apply, Wyoming has an intriguing system which I currently like as I just drew an archery elk tag (wont be back anytime soon after 2010), Arizona is tough etc, etc, etc.
Wouldn't it just be easier to use the New Mexico system and pay upfront for the tag and apply? The odds in NM are better than many states and you can purchase a landowner tag if you are unsuccessful in the draw. NM holds tags the majority of the tags for the state residents. Simplicity seems to have its advantages.
What do you guys think?