Great post, Randy.
I mean this respectfully- this point above is exactly why I feel so strongly that wildlife and the land on which it lives cannot and should not be separated conceptually. I get and understand the legalistic argument, but one relies so much upon the other that it is impossible to uncouple.
As far as the subject of the article, I feel bad for him- but I’d have felt a lot worse ten years ago. After getting “wildlife is state-owned” rammed down our throats so often lately, it sure seems like a short-sighted battle cry when issues like this are being discussed.