Hey MT, will this make any difference?

[elkduds]

MSN

 

[Big Sky Guy]

Is this really how far we’ve fallen? Bodnar and then straight D is the only way to vote in support of public lands?

 

[Gr8bawana]

Or keep vote to keep the status quo and expect different results and risk losing OUR PUBLIC LANDS.

 

[Gulf of America]

Is this really how far we’ve fallen? Bodnar and then straight D is the only way to vote in support of public lands?

The dems didn’t write the MT GOP platform that STILL lists transfer of federal public lands. And with the way the state party went after the ones (including our very own Albus) that didn’t tow the line, it’s pretty clear they don’t really want folks who actually listen to their constituents. All that being said, the linked “voter information book” is basically the same as an NRA A or F rating. Meaningless, predictable, and without substance.

 

[INMT]

MSN

Unfortunately no. None at all.

 

[shrapnel]

Forstag? You’ve got to be kidding

 

[Big Sky Guy]

The dems didn’t write the MT GOP platform that STILL lists transfer of federal public lands. And with the way the state party went after the ones (including our very own Albus) that didn’t tow the line, it’s pretty clear they don’t really want folks who actually listen to their constituents. All that being said, the linked “voter information book” is basically the same as an NRA A or F rating. Meaningless, predictable, and without substance.

This is exactly my point and frustration. We live in a system where candidates cannot have ideas/views/policies that do not align with whatever the national Dem or GOP party is doing it seems.

Ditto regarding NRA, just heard an ad on the radio for Alme the other day propping Alme up and the whole ad was about the NRA's F rating for Bodnar. LOL.

 

[Nameless Range]

It won't make a damn bit of difference. We've now got about a decade of evidence of Ds pointing to the public land positions of Rs and their party in this state and the place has only gotten redder.

 

[BuzzH]

Forstag? You’ve got to be kidding

Yeah nothing worse than a pro hunting, pro second, pro public land candidate that also supports working class folks and is pro Union. The horror.

The guy worked his ass off as a smoke jumper for BS wages as well.

Pretty tough to find a candidate that aligns more with what matters to me.

Plus he's not some burned out old boomer stuck in 1950.

 

[Gulf of America]

Plus he's not some burned out old boomer stuck in 1950.

To be fair, his opponent is a burned out old boomer stuck in 1950, he’s a know-it-all jackass who wants to take this country back to 1950 even though he wasn’t even a dream in his dad’s nuts in 1950.

 

[Treeshark]

That was beautifully said.

 

[shrapnel]

I get it, Hunttalk is agree with Buzz or don’t say anything.

That’s a real good barometer of tolerance. Like or dislike Aaron Flint, he can’t sell or trade public land without a considerable backing from a constituency that isn’t going to back him!

I’m one of those, I would not support any public land sell out at any cost.

I’m also not a single issue voter enough to see the baggage that Forstag brings, is not enough to offset his supposed position on public lands.