<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> Elkchsr said, "The next place that I have seen that was devastated beyond redemption was Yellowstone, just after the fires came thru and the scientists again said it would be hundreds of years before it was even close to where it would be productive again...."
HUH?
Where do you come up with the crap you post? What scientists said that and where did they say it? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
It was all over the news as it happened...
I don't remember the commentators but the channels at the time were 4, 5, 7, 11, we all know they have to get their info from somewhere...
I guess you just can't believe every thing you hear on TV now can you...: rolleyes:
They all had different specialists at the time of the fire saying this and that. Then when my wife and I took a walk thru the park early the next summer, this is what the information places were touting about some of the areas...The parks people even put up placards for every one to see, this info had to come from somewhere...
This is when I started formulating the fact that you just can't believe every thing you see in print
. Even if it is right their in front of the 'damaged' area.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> You know, you rant and rave about how worthless an education is...I got news for you, the one person on this board who could use a bit of formal education in Natural resources and the understanding of ecosystems is YOU. I mean for Christ sake, every first year Forestry student understands and learns the dynamics of lodgepole forest life cycles...you know stand replacement. Yellowstone was a totally natural situation, and for thousands of years lodgepole ecosystems have evolved with catastrophic stand replacement fire cycles...usually on about a 150-200 year interval...which is just about the exact age of most of what burned in Yellowstone.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
The only one that I really see that is full of rants and rage is you, you want every one else to always dig up proof and what not, but here is one for you to dig up, and this one should be easy, because you can look it up in the archives right here.
Now don't as is your usual old grouchy self, run off and take a sentence out of context, show me where I ever said, "You know, you rant and rave about how worthless an education is..."
You take every thing some one says that you just can't stand only see the few little things that you want to see, nothing more, I want to see where I ever said education is all a worthless endeavor, prove it and I will apologize, if not, you owe me one for stating such lies.
If you would read more than one sentence in any ones post, you would see that I have never uttered such a far-fetched statement as this. But when some one is pissing in your cheerios all the time, and it is probably you, it is easy to see where such hatred and anger sits...Kind of like spitting into the wind isn't it!!!
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> I find it very hard to believe that any credible "scientist" you could cite would have made a claim that Yellowstone was not going to recover. If you do find some literature to cite (I would be shocked if you did), I'd bet good money they dont have a lick of formal education in Forestry. This drives the point home that formal education is very valuable and necessary...and those that have it, wont be duped into believing chicken shit posts that make ridiculous claims.
I think you're confusing science and scientists with the 6 O'clock news and the interviews with the local talent from Cooke City standing in front of their burnt down trailer house,(while wearing their favorite terry cloth bath robe and hair curlers), telling all the viewers how it was "Total pandalerium" and was "devastated beyond redemption." <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Now I thought just about every one believed in the six-o-clock news...
This is where most get their info, right wrong or indifferent.
Then you have a few of those that have gotten their knowledge, usually in the form of Government grants and what not, then use the knowledge given to them to walk around with their chests all puffed out and act as if they are the king shit just because they know "all" the answers and the rest of us, know matter how learned we are in our own way are inferior.
This kind of learning scares the hell out of those that are supposed to be in the know, because things are said that are not in books anywhere. The "Learned" will degrade these individuals all they can, running them down at every opportunity.
I will give you a perfect example of this, you can look it up if you want, I will not show you any thing in writing, it is already well documented..
I will only say this-the phrase "The world is flat", if I remember my history right, “Learned people”, ridiculed the individual that came up with this statement, to the ends of the earth, forgive my pun
.
Before you jump to any conclusions about this post on what I am saying or not, let me point out that not every thing you say is actually true, maybe most is true, but even that is getting farther and farther apart. All you have been putting into the fray any more is snide comments, nasty remarks laced with snotty cynicism.
I see no higher learning here; any one can sit here and do that, which by the way you are showing you are very good at, wouldn’t be any thing I would personally get puffy chested about, but that is ones own personal preference...
But it really proves nothing, no intelligence is portrayed in it, really doesn’t get a good point across, but do as you like and I will continue on as I have…