MOOOOOving back to the bison....Here are things I know (or think I know) about bison:
1) They are generally easier to manage than cattle (thanks Buzz)
2) Bison is healthier food-wise than beef
3) There is an overpopulation of bison in Yellowstone, which are often being slaughtered as a result
4) There are grazing allotments just outside of Yellowstone, but the bison can't use them because of cattle
Given all these things, it seems logical in my ignorance to ditch cattle altogether and let the ranchers ranch bison instead. Why not declare the grazing allotments in question off-limits to cattle, but GIVE the surplus bison to the ranchers for use in creating their own herd o' buffalers? The only big issue I see is convincing the public to eat more bison, but if prices & PR were used to make it attractive I doubt anyone would complain too much.
By doing that you a) take care of the "welfare ranchers," b) take care of the grazing allotments and c) take care of the concentrated bison herds.
Hunting wouldn't happen in that scenario, which sucks a little. But, this organization pushing the cattle-kicking openly states that their goal is to stop the bison slaughter anyway. Other than that, what information am I missing?
<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 07-11-2003 10:14: Message edited by: dgibson ]</font>