Forum improvement

The most odd thing about this, of all people to understand 2 sides of argument I would expect an alleged attorney would top the list.

One of the many things I was wrong about. Never experienced someone with such thin skin, and skewed reality of Montana Mule Deer Management.
Haha reaction. You salty old bastard. Engagement up
 
This seems like an ok move to make, honestly. And I say that as someone who gets way more reaction thingies than quoted replies.

Silly/offbeat topics don't have a lot of gravity, but it would be nice if serious topics that do have gravity got more serious participation, and people responded with thought-out replies instead of passive aggressive laughing faces or simple thumbs-ups reactions. I'd even accept more confrontational mtmuley-style PM messages if it meant more real engagement overall.

I first came to this forum as a place to learn things and share experiences - of course over time as I became more comfortable I developed a more casual attitude, but I still really enjoy the serious, meaty hunting and public land topics most of all. Being an idiot, I don't usually have much to say in them, but I do enjoy reading them. Serious threads on this forum can yield a ton of useful insights. There are quite a few members here who have a lot to say that can really make you think.

Certainly there might be an uptick in less-than-useful "nice bull" replies, and enough snarky/sarcastic replies to beat the band (this thread is demonstrating that, for sure), but at least those sentiments will have a voice now. I think there's value in that in and of itself.
TLDR but like anyway
 
I’ve liked, I’ve loved, I’ve argued and I’ve been banned. All the above. Never reported never will.

I will miss being able to like a joke, meme, recipe or sweet kill pic.

After being banned I gained far more insight by using PM’s and restraint. I’ll continue that.

I’ll try interacting more. I did just find out I get an extra night bear hunting this weekend. Thursday-Saturday eve now. Solo trip hopefully have some good chit to add.

Peace be to all.
Like
 
I’ve yet to read thru 11 pages of comments - actually a reason for that - so my apologies if this has been covered already.

The most valuable part of 👍🤣😍 for me is (was) cracking into a thread with hundreds or thousands of replies already and being able to zip through it rapidly. Posts with 3 likes or less gets skipped, 4-5 likes I skim, and 6+ likes I will read the whole post if it isn’t too long.

With the new (old) system, it takes twice as long or longer for me to review the content, so for me it is actually a lot less overall engagement.

The humor threads, pic threads, and hunt journals are no different. The heavier topics and deep dives into important issues are the ones that suffer the most.
Like (don’t block me)
 
The most odd thing about this, of all people to understand 2 sides of argument I would expect an alleged attorney would top the list.

One of the many things I was wrong about. Never experienced someone with such thin skin, and skewed reality of Montana Mule Deer Management.
👍🏼
 

Forum statistics

Threads
115,608
Messages
2,103,855
Members
37,219
Latest member
Badknees104
Back
Top